Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 802

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Affinity purification of antibodies from diazotized paper blots of heterogeneous protein samples.

Open access
Olmsted, J.B.·1981·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

A method is described for the affinity purification of antibodies using protein samples that have been electrophoretically transferred to diazotized paper. Using differentiated neuroblastoma cells as the protein sample and a heterogeneous anti-microtubule protein serum, antibodies were isolated that specifically bound only to tubulin on blots and that stained microtubule networks in cells. The general utility of this method for various types of applications is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)43211-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 802

Metadata

Authors
Olmsted, J. B.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1981-12
Volume
256
Issue
23
Pages
11955-11957
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1566845757
Cited by
802
References
1
FWCI
17.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Affinity purification of antibodies from diazotized paper blots of heterogeneous protein samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)43211-5
The paper
Olmsted, J. B. (1981). Affinity purification of antibodies from diazotized paper blots of heterogeneous protein samples. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)43211-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.