Cited by 224Liver physiology and pathologyNF-κB Signaling PathwaysOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Rapid activation of post-hepatectomy factor/nuclear factor kappa B in hepatocytes, a primary response in the regenerating liver.

Open access
Cressman, D E, Greenbaum, L E, Haber, B A, Taub, R·1994·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The liver represents one of the few organs in the intact animal that has the capacity to regenerate following injury or partial hepatectomy. One of the earliest responses that has been detected in the remnant liver is the activation of post-hepatectomy factor(s) (PHF), a kappa B site DNA binding activity. We reasoned that understanding the molecular nature of PHF might provide insight into what triggers liver regeneration. We found that PHF is rapidly activated and turned over in the regenerating liver, demonstrating peak activity at 30 min post-hepatectomy and virtual disappearance by 1 h. As determined by supershift, cross-linking, and cross-linking/immunoprecipitation analyses, PHF contains intact p50/p65nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) subunits. To explore the basis for activation of PHF/NF-kappa B in the regenerating liver, we determined the level of individual Rel family subunits in the nuclei of normal and regenerating liver cells. We found evidence for nuclear translocation of p65/RelA, but other Rel family proteins including p50/NF-kappa B1 and p52/NF-kappa B2 are present at a low level in the nuclei of cells at a constitutive level pre- and post-hepatectomy and appear not to form DNA binding homodimers. The level of I kappa B-alpha falls slightly then increases at 3 h post-hepatectomy in concert with the induction of its mRNA. As demonstrated by the induction of I kappa B-alpha mRNA in hepatocytes in situ and identification of PHF/NF-kappa B in cultured hepatocyt…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)43831-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several immediate early genes induced after partial hepatectomy are target genes of STAT3 and NF-kB.

    “Several of these induced genes are target genes of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 and nuclear factor kappa B (NFB), two transcription factors that are activated early during liver regeneration.5,6”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 224

Authors
Cressman, D. E., Greenbaum, L. E., Haber, B. A., & Taub, R.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-12
Volume
269
Issue
48
Pages
30429-30435
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1553821945
Cited by
224
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › NF-κB Signaling Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
NF-κB activation, liver regeneration, hepatocytes, IκBα, p50/p65 heterodimer, mitogenic signaling
MeSH terms
NF-KappaB Inhibitor alpha, Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Line, Cell Nucleus, DNA-Binding Proteins, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Female, Kinetics, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Molecular Sequence Data, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Rats, Inbred F344, Recombinant Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, NF-kappa B, In Situ Hybridization, I-kappa B Proteins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review