The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The zinc fingers of human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase are differentially required for the recognition of DNA breaks and nicks and the consequent enzyme activation. Other structures recognize intact DNA.
Open accessAbstract
The recognition of double-stranded DNA breaks and single-stranded nicks by human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and the consequent enzymic activation were examined using derivatives of the enzyme expressed in Escherichia coli. The N-terminal 162 residues encompass two zinc fingers. Deletion or mutation of the first finger results in a loss of activation by DNA with either single-stranded or double-stranded damage. Destruction of the second finger reduces activation by double-stranded DNA breaks only slightly, but eliminates activation by single-stranded DNA nicks. These data suggest that activation by single-stranded DNA nicks requires two zinc fingers, but activation by double-stranded DNA breaks requires only the finger closer to the N terminus. Variant proteins that lack both zinc fingers are enzymically inactive but still exhibit weak DNA binding, which is independent of DNA damage. Thus, other regions are also capable of binding intact DNA, but the recognition of a strand nick or break which occasions the synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose) specifically requires the zinc fingers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structural Basis for DNA Damage–Dependent Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation by Human PARP-1
Langelier, M.-F., Planck, J. L., Roy, S., & Pascal, J. M. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1216338 · Cited by 665
Hassa, P. (2008) · Frontiers in Bioscience · doi:10.2741/2909 · Cited by 584
PARP-1, a determinant of cell survival in response to DNA damage
Bouchard, V. J., Rouleau, M., & Poirier, G. G. (2003) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/s0301-472x(03)00083-3 · Cited by 388
Grube, K., & Bürkle, A. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.24.11759 · Cited by 301
Molecular and biochemical features of poly (ADP-ribose) metabolism
Lautier, D., Lagueux, J., Thibodeau, J., M�nard, L., & Poirier, G. G. (1993) · Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf01076101 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Ikejima, M., Noguchi, S., Yamashita, R., Ogura, T., Sugimura, T., Gill, D. M., & Miwa, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 265
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 21907-21913
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1679032940
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The zinc fingers of human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase are differentially required for the recognition of DNA breaks and nicks and the consequent enzyme activation. Other structures recognize intact DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)45824-3
- The paper
- Ikejima, M., Noguchi, S., Yamashita, R., Ogura, T., Sugimura, T., Gill, D. M., & Miwa, M. (1990). The zinc fingers of human poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase are differentially required for the recognition of DNA breaks and nicks and the consequent enzyme activation. Other structures recognize intact DNA. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)45824-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.