The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cadmium uptake and toxicity via voltage-sensitive calcium channels.
Open accessAbstract
The mechanism of cellular uptake of cadmium, a highly toxic metal ion, is not known. We have studied cadmium uptake and toxicity in an established secretory cell line, GH4C1, which has well characterized calcium channels. Nimodipine, an antagonist of voltage-sensitive calcium channels, protected cells against cadmium toxicity by increasing the LD50 for CdCl2 from 15 to 45 microM, whereas the calcium channel agonist BAY K8644 decreased the LD50. Organic calcium channel blockers of three classes protected cells from cadmium toxicity at concentrations previously shown to block high K+-induced 45Ca2+ influx and secretion. Half-maximal protective effects were obtained at 20 nM nifedipine, 4 microM verapamil, and 7 microM diltiazem. Increasing the extracellular calcium concentration from 20 microM to 10 mM also protected cells from cadmium by causing a 5-fold increase in the LD50 for CdCl2. Neither the calcium channel antagonist nimodipine nor the agonist BAY K8644 altered intracellular metallothionein concentrations, while cadmium caused a 9-20-fold increase in metallothionein over 18 h. Cadmium was a potent blocker of depolarization-stimulated 45Ca2+ uptake (IC50 = 4 microM), and the net uptake of cadmium measured with 109Cd2+ was less than 0.3% that of calcium. Although the rate of cadmium uptake was low relative to that of calcium, entry via voltage-sensitive calcium channels appeared to account for a significant portion of cadmium uptake; 109Cd2+ uptake at 30 min was increased 57% by high K+/BAY K8644, which facilitates entry through channels. Furthermore, calcium channel blockade with 100 nM nimodipine decreased total cell 109Cd2+ accumulation after 24 h by 63%. These data indicate that flux of cadmium through dihydropyridine-sensitive, voltage-sensitive calcium channels is a major mechanism for cadmium uptake by GH4C1 cells, and that pharmacologic blockade of calcium channels can afford dramatic protection against cadmium toxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role of mineral nutrition in minimizing cadmium accumulation by plants
Sarwar, N., Saifullah, Malhi, S. S., Zia, M. H., Naeem, A., Bibi, S., & Farid, G. (2010) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.3916 · Cited by 746
Zhao, F., Hamon, R. E., Lombi, E., McLaughlin, M. J., & McGrath, S. P. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.368.535 · Cited by 385
Lung Clearance of Inhaled Insoluble and Soluble Particles
OBERDÖRSTER, G. (1988) · Journal of Aerosol Medicine · doi:10.1089/jam.1988.1.289 · Cited by 157
Kinetics of Zinc and Cadmium Exchanges between Metallothionein and Carbonic Anhydrase
Pinter, T. B. J., & Stillman, M. J. (2015) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00912 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Hinkle, P., Kinsella, P., & Osterhoudt, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 262
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 16333-16337
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1544673104
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cadmium uptake and toxicity via voltage-sensitive calcium channels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)49259-9
- The paper
- Hinkle, P., Kinsella, P., & Osterhoudt, K. (1987). Cadmium uptake and toxicity via voltage-sensitive calcium channels. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)49259-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.