The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein-DNA interactions at a dioxin-responsive enhancer. Analysis of six bona fide DNA-binding sites for the liganded Ah receptor.
Open accessAbstract
The DNA upstream of the dioxin-inducible CYP1A1 gene contains six distinct sites to which the liganded Ah receptor binds in intact mouse hepatoma cells. Here, we have analyzed these six bona fide receptor-binding sites in order to study the relationships between DNA sequence, receptor binding, and dioxin responsiveness. Gel retardation studies reveal that the sites vary by about 7-fold in their relative affinities for the liganded receptor. Within this range, there is no obvious association between the strength of receptor binding and the degree of dioxin responsiveness, as measured in transfection experiments. In fact, one site binds the receptor well but fails to respond to dioxin. This observation implies that the receptor-DNA binding event per se is not sufficient to confer dioxin responsiveness upon a linked gene. Comparison of the DNA sequences of the six receptor-binding sites permits the derivation of a "functional consensus" recognition sequence, which is more extended in length than the "core"-binding sequence previously described. In corroboration of these results, protein-DNA cross-linking studies indicate that the liganded receptor contacts base pairs beyond the core sequence. Our observations also indicate that the liganded receptor can tolerate limited sequence heterogeneity at its DNA-binding site and still elicit a response to dioxin. This finding might reflect corresponding heterogeneity in the amino acid sequence of the liganded receptor's DNA-binding domain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Poland, A., Glover, E., & Kende, A. S. (1976) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(17)33205-2 · Cited by 1,370
Drouin, J., Trifiro, M. A., Plante, R. K., Nemer, M., Eriksson, P., & Wrange, Ö. (1989) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.9.12.5305-5314.1989 · Cited by 283
Cited by
Wang, G. L., Jiang, B. H., Rue, E. A., & Semenza, G. L. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.12.5510 · Cited by 6,212
The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Complex
Hankinson, O. (1995) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pa.35.040195.001515 · Cited by 1,649
Denison, M. S., Soshilov, A. A., He, G., DeGroot, D. E., & Zhao, B. (2011) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfr218 · Cited by 748
The Search for Endogenous Activators of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
Nguyen, L. P., & Bradfield, C. A. (2008) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx7001965 · Cited by 709
Matikainen, T., Perez, G. I., Jurisicova, A., Pru, J. K., Schlezinger, J. J., Ryu, H.-Y., Laine, J., Sakai, T., Korsmeyer, S. J., Casper, R. F., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng575 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Lusska, A., Shen, E., & Whitlock, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 6575-6580
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1600605923
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein-DNA interactions at a dioxin-responsive enhancer. Analysis of six bona fide DNA-binding sites for the liganded Ah receptor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)53289-0
- The paper
- Lusska, A., Shen, E., & Whitlock, J. P. (1993). Protein-DNA interactions at a dioxin-responsive enhancer. Analysis of six bona fide DNA-binding sites for the liganded Ah receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)53289-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.