Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiple parameters control the selectivity of nuclear receptors for their response elements. Selectivity and promiscuity in response element recognition by retinoic acid receptors and retinoid X receptors.

Open access
Mader, S., Leroy, P., Chen, J.Y., Chambon, P.·1993·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

A number of nuclear receptors are capable of binding to specific DNA sequences known as response elements that correspond to two 5'-PuG(G/T)TCA motifs. We have systematically compared the selectivity of DNA sequence recognition by the estrogen receptor and the retinoic acid receptor (RAR) and retinoid X receptor (RXR), using a variety of synthetic oligonucleotides related to natural response elements. The importance of the spacing and relative orientation of the PuG(G/T)TCA motifs as well as the possible role of the flanking sequences were investigated for each receptor. We find that the three receptors have different response element preferences and that their intrinsic DNA binding properties cannot be simply ascribed to spacing or orientation rules. For example, RARs bind with similar efficiencies to response elements containing directly repeated PuGTTCA motifs separated by 2, 3, 4, or 5 base pairs, and RXRs bind to response elements in which the directly repeated motifs are separated by 1, 2, and 5 base pairs. The actual sequence of the repeated motifs and the nature of their flanking bases appear to be important parameters in determining RAR and RXR binding efficiencies. The possibility that the binding specificity of nuclear receptors can be modified by interactions with other proteins, in particular other nuclear receptors, is discussed in relation to the patterns of transcriptional activation observed with either endogenous or transiently expressed receptors on chimeric promoters containing various response elements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)54192-2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 203

Metadata

Authors
Mader, S., Leroy, P., Chen, J. Y., & Chambon, P.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-01
Volume
268
Issue
1
Pages
591-600
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1814235153
Cited by
203
References
3
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple parameters control the selectivity of nuclear receptors for their response elements. Selectivity and promiscuity in response element recognition by retinoic acid receptors and retinoid X receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)54192-2
The paper
Mader, S., Leroy, P., Chen, J. Y., & Chambon, P. (1993). Multiple parameters control the selectivity of nuclear receptors for their response elements. Selectivity and promiscuity in response element recognition by retinoic acid receptors and retinoid X receptors. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)54192-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.