Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE CHROMOPROTEINS, HEMOGLOBIN, MYOGLOBIN, AND CYTOCHROME c, IN THE TISSUES OF DIFFERENT SPECIES, AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE TOTAL CONTENT OF EACH CHROMOPROTEIN TO BODY MASS

Open access
Drabkin, David L.·1950·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

It is recognized that the over-all energy metabolism and, hence, the oxygen consumption bear a relationship of proportionality, not to body mass, but to a fractional exponent of this quantity. The skin surface area has a similar mathematical relation to the body mass. Thus, approximately equal values for caloric output (heat loss) or for oxygen intake per unit time are obtainable in species of different size, when these measurements are related either to a fractional exponent of their body masses (2, 3) or to their measured or calculated surface areas (4, 5). One avoids the direction of thought into unproductive channels by not pursuing the academic arguments (2, 3) as to which of these bases of reference (fractional exponent of body mass or surface area) is the more correct or valid in expressing the basal metabolism. On the whole, similar deductions can be arrived at from each empirical reference base, and each suffers from similar disadvantages and defects, which are largely owing to the fact that they appear to support a concept, very probably incorrect, that all kinds of protoplasm are the same. Nevertheless, valuable clinical inferences have been made in man by the use of the surface area base, and, without undue faith in their ultimate significance, both surface area and fractional exponent of the body mass are of service in the interpretation of the over-all metabolism of different species. With reference to specific metabolites or some of the agencies of metabolism and their relationship to body mass, the present knowledge is fragmentary. Dreyer et al. (6, 7), who first introduced the fractional expo-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)56550-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Drabkin, D. L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1950-01
Volume
182
Issue
1
Pages
317-333
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1580808958
Cited by
174
References
1
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE CHROMOPROTEINS, HEMOGLOBIN, MYOGLOBIN, AND CYTOCHROME c, IN THE TISSUES OF DIFFERENT SPECIES, AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE TOTAL CONTENT OF EACH CHROMOPROTEIN TO BODY MASS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)56550-9
The paper
Drabkin, D. L. (1950). THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE CHROMOPROTEINS, HEMOGLOBIN, MYOGLOBIN, AND CYTOCHROME c, IN THE TISSUES OF DIFFERENT SPECIES, AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE TOTAL CONTENT OF EACH CHROMOPROTEIN TO BODY MASS. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)56550-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.