Cited by 89DNA Repair MechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

Effect of sequence, adduct type, and opposing lesions on the binding and repair of ultraviolet photodamage by DNA photolyase and (A)BC excinuclease

Open access
Svoboda, D.L., Smith, C.A., Taylor, J.S., Sancar, A.·1993·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The cis,syn and (6-4) products of dipyrimidine sites are the major mutagenic and lethal UV photoproducts in DNA. To investigate their relative susceptibilities to repair and other factors such as sequence context and lesions in the complementary strand that might influence repair efficiencies, we constructed 49-mer duplexes containing site-specific photoproducts of thymidylyl(3',5')thymidine sites at central locations. Using these substrates, we measured the binding of Escherichia coli DNA photolyase to cis,syn dimers in four sequence contexts and to two cis,syn dimers in close proximity and on opposing strands. We found that the sequence within a 10-base pair region had little effect on binding and that two enzyme molecules bound to substrate containing two dimers in the 5'-staggered orientation, but not in the 3'-staggered one. Similarly, the excision of a cis,syn dimer by (A)BC excinuclease was not influenced by the sequence in the immediate vicinity of the dimer, and the enzyme was active on 5'-staggered cis,syn dimers, but not on 3'-staggered ones. Of special significance, we found that (A)BC excinuclease removed the cis,syn, trans,syn-I, (6-4), and Dewar photoproducts at vastly differing relative rates of 1:6:9:9, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)82253-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NER can only process one damage at a time because the lesion must be in a double-stranded configuration.

    “NER can only process one damage at a time because the lesion needs to be in a double-stranded configuration [79].”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [79]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 2 · Cited by 89

Authors
Svoboda, D. L., Smith, C. A., Taylor, J. S., & Sancar, A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-05
Volume
268
Issue
14
Pages
10694-10700
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1483750611
Cited by
89
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
DNA photolyase, UV photoproducts, 6-4 photoproducts, sequence context, Escherichia coli, photoreactivation, excision repair
MeSH terms
Base Composition, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, DNA Damage, Deoxyribodipyrimidine Photo-Lyase, DNA Repair, Endodeoxyribonucleases, Escherichia coli, Kinetics, Molecular Sequence Data, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Pyrimidine Dimers, Substrate Specificity, Ultraviolet Rays, Escherichia coli Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review