The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A BUFFER SOLUTION FOR COLORIMETRIC COMPARISON
Open accessAbstract
In the use of standard buffer solutions for calorimetric comparison where more than a restricted range of reaction is required, it has been necessary in the past to make use of several solutions. The author has developed a system requiring but two stock solutions and covering a range of from pH 2.2 to pH 8.0 which approximately includes the limits of reaction for arable soils and physiological media. The materials used are as follows: 0.2 M disodium phosphate1 and 0.1 M citric acid, combined in such volumes as to make 20 cc. of the mixture. The disodium phosphate employed was recrystallized three times. A 0.2 M solution was prepared by titration against I&Cl, using methyl orange as indicator. Although the titration endpoint was not distinct, the error in the resulting mixtures was usually not appreciable, seldom exceeding 0.01 pH. On account of the variable water of crystallization content of the phosphate salt2 the stock solution was standardized by titration in order to have a reproducible method. Upon exposure to the air for a period of 2 weeks the water of crystallization of disodium phosphate is reduced to 2 molecules. If, after exposure, a quantity of the salt is kept on hand in a closed container and the correct weight of the salt required to produce the proper concentration of stock solution determined by titration, it is possible at any time to make up the stock solution by simply weighing out the salt. The citric acid was recrystallized at least twice before using.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Specificity of S-Adenosylmethionine Derivatives in Methyl Transfer Reactions
Zappia, V, Zydek-Cwick, C. R., & Schlenk, F. (1969) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)94346-2 · Cited by 276
Chen, C., Shrestha, R., Jia, K., Gao, P. F., Geisbrecht, B. V., Bossmann, S. H., Shi, J., & Li, P. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m115.658807 · Cited by 124
Dallas, W. S., Gowen, J. E., Ray, P. H., Cox, M. J., & Dev, I. K. (1992) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.174.18.5961-5970.1992 · Cited by 111
Zimbardi, A., Camargo, P., Carli, S., Aquino Neto, S., Meleiro, L., Rosa, J., De Andrade, A., Jorge, J., & Furriel, R. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17050672 · Cited by 71
Augusto, P. E. D., Ibarz, R., Garvín, A., & Ibarz, A. (2015) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2015.04.046 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- McIlvaine, T. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1921-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 183-186
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1491373961
- Cited by
- 1,552
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A BUFFER SOLUTION FOR COLORIMETRIC COMPARISON. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)86000-8
- The paper
- McIlvaine, T. C. (1921). A BUFFER SOLUTION FOR COLORIMETRIC COMPARISON. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)86000-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.