Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stoichiometry of Respiratory Stimulation, Accumulation of Ca++ and Phosphate, and Oxidative Phosphorylation in Rat Liver Mitochondria

Open access
Rossi, Carlo Stefano, Lehninger, Albert L.·1964·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Isolated mitochondria of various tissues have been found to accumulate large amounts of Ca++ and phosphate from the medium in a process stoichiometrically dependent on high energy intermediates generated by the energy-conserving mechanisms of the respiratory chain (cf. References l-18). In most of the cited investigations (e.g. References 2, 3, 5, 11, 13), the mitochondria were exposed to relatively high concentrations of Ca* (2 to 4 mM), which are known to cause complete uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation (cj. References 2, 19, 20), mitochondrial swelling (cf. Reference 21), and stimulation of the formation of endogenous, free fatty acids (22). Nevertheless, nearly exact stoichiometry of Ca++ uptake with electron transport could be demonstrated under these conditions (10, 11). Adenosine triphosphate is necessary in such experiments to support Ca++ uptake, for reasons which are not understood (1, 2, 59-11, 23). There is another set of observations in which much lower concentrations of Ca++ (i.e. 100 to 400 PM) have been employed. Siekevitz and Potter (19) and Potter, Siekevitz, and Simonson (20) showed that low concentrations of Ca+f greatly stimulated respiration of rat liver mitochondria. Chance showed that the addition of Ca++ to resting mitochondria in the absence of ADP produced a transient stimulation of respiration; the oxygen uptake returned to its original rate after a period of stimulation in a manner resembling the activation of respiration by ADP (23, 24). The addition of about 2.2 moles of Ca++ was required to stimulate the same amount of extra oxygen uptake as given by 1.0 mole of ADP. Chance (24) assumed that Ca++ was accumulated in the mitochondria stoichiometrically during the period of respiratory stimulation, but he reported no actual measurements of Ca++ uptake to support this important conclusion. A second finding made with low concentrations of Ca* is that phosphate does not necessarily enter the mitochondria with Ca++ (4, 6, 7, 25) ; in contrast, experiments carried out with high concentrations of Ca++ showed that phosphate is required for Ca++ uptake and is accumulated with Ca(2, 5, 11). Apparently, ATP is not required for accumulation of low concentrations of Ca++ (4, 6, 7; 23-25), again in contrast with the experiments in which high concentrations of Gaff were studied. It has been rather diffi-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)91230-5

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Rossi, C. S., & Lehninger, A. L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1964-11
Volume
239
Issue
11
Pages
3971-3980
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1581917124
Cited by
441
References
21
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stoichiometry of Respiratory Stimulation, Accumulation of Ca++ and Phosphate, and Oxidative Phosphorylation in Rat Liver Mitochondria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)91230-5
The paper
Rossi, C. S., & Lehninger, A. L. (1964). Stoichiometry of Respiratory Stimulation, Accumulation of Ca++ and Phosphate, and Oxidative Phosphorylation in Rat Liver Mitochondria. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)91230-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.