Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Lipolytic and Antilipolytic Substances on Adenosine 3′,5′-Monophosphate Levels in Isolated Fat Cells

Open access
Butcher, R W, Baird, C E, Sutherland, E W·1968·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Abstract The actions of certain lipolytic and antilipolytic agents were studied in isolated fat cells at the level of cyclic AMP. The following observations were made. Epinephrine (5.5 µm) produced small but significant changes in cyclic AMP levels in 10-min incubations while caffeine (1 mm) was without significant effect. In combination, epinephrine and caffeine acted synergistically, producing large increases in cyclic AMP, indicating that, as in other systems, the catecholamines act to stimulate adenyl cyclase and the methyl xanthines act to inhibit the cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase. Other hormones which acted to increase cyclic AMP levels in the presence of 1 mm caffeine included adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), glucagon, thyroid-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, norepinephrine, and the synthetic catecholamine isoproterenol. Increased levels of cyclic AMP were detectable within 30 sec after the addition of epinephrine to fat cells incubated with 1 mm caffeine and were maximal at about 6 min, after which they declined. Supramaximal epinephrine and supramaximal ACTH together did not produce greater stimulation than either agent alone, which suggested that they might act at the same location. Three compounds with antilipolytic activity were tested. Insulin decreased cyclic AMP levels in fat cells exposed to epinephrine, ACTH, or glucagon in the presence of caffeine, while the β-adrenergic blocking agent pronethalol was effective against epinephrine but not ACTH or glucagon under the experimental conditions used. Nicotinic acid decreased cyclic AMP levels in the presence of epinephrine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)93503-9

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 554

Metadata

Authors
Butcher, R. W., Baird, C. E., & Sutherland, E. W.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1968-04
Volume
243
Issue
8
Pages
1705-1712
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1483105549
Cited by
554
References
29
FWCI
25.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Lipolytic and Antilipolytic Substances on Adenosine 3′,5′-Monophosphate Levels in Isolated Fat Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)93503-9
The paper
Butcher, R. W., Baird, C. E., & Sutherland, E. W. (1968). Effects of Lipolytic and Antilipolytic Substances on Adenosine 3′,5′-Monophosphate Levels in Isolated Fat Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)93503-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.