Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 412

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A New Calibration Procedure for Gel Filtration Columns

Open access
Ackers, G.K.·1967·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

A new procedure for column calibration is described based on the assumption that microregions of nonexcluded volume within the gel are distributed randomly with respect to the sizes of molecules they can accommodate. This approach leads to a linear relationship between molecular radius and the inverse error function complement of the column partition coefficient. Excellent agreement of the relationship is obtained with experimental data over a wide range of molecular size as well as a diversity of molecular species and column bed materials. The new method is simple and convenient to use and has the advantage over previous methods in that it is not based on any hypothetical structures for the gel matrix.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)95955-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Ackers, G. K.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1967-07
Volume
242
Issue
13
Pages
3237-3238
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1533372454
Cited by
412
References
0
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Calibration Procedure for Gel Filtration Columns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)95955-7
The paper
Ackers, G. K. (1967). A New Calibration Procedure for Gel Filtration Columns. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(18)95955-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.