Cited by 413

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Suppression of 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Activity and Inhibition of Growth of Human Fibroblasts by 7-Ketocholesterol

Brown, Michael S., Goldstein, Joseph L.·1974·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Of 47 steroid compounds tested for their ability to suppress 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity in cultured human fibroblasts, 11 were more potent than cholesterol. The only consistent structural requirement for suppression of enzyme activity was the presence of an unesterified oxygen function at position 3 of the sterol nucleus. The presence of a ketone or hydroxyl group at positions 6, 7, or 25 markedly enhanced inhibitory activity. In fibroblasts from a homozygote with familial hypercholesterolemia, which are genetically resistant to physiological enzyme suppression by cholesterol contained in low density lipoproteins, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity was suppressed by nonlipoprotein steroids to the same degree as in normal cells. 7-Ketocholesterol, which was 100 times more potent than cholesterol on a weight basis, suppressed enzyme activity in normal cells by more than 90% in 2 hours. This inhibition was reflected in a similarly marked decrease in the rate of incorporation of acetate, but not mevalonate into digitonin-precipitable sterols. When normal cells were cultured in the presence of 7-ketocholesterol but in the absence of lipoproteins, the suppression of endogenous cholesterol synthesis by 7-ketocholesterol resulted in a marked inhibition of cell growth. This inhibition of growth was prevented by the presence in the culture medium of either cholesterol or mevalonate, but not acetate. Thus, the activity of 3-hydroxy-3-m…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)42106-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Brown, 1973, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 70, 2162, 10.1073/pnas.70.7.2162 · DOI
  2. Goldstein, 1973, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 70, 2804, 10.1073/pnas.70.10.2804 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brown, 1974, J. Biol. Chem., 249, 789, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42998-0 · DOI
  4. Brown, 1974, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 71, 788, 10.1073/pnas.71.3.788 · DOI
  5. Goldstein, 1974, J. Biol. Chem., 249, 5153, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42341-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Goldstein, 1974, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 26, 199
  7. Brown, 1974, Science, 185, 61, 10.1126/science.185.4145.61 · DOI
  8. Kandutsch, 1973, J. Biol. Chem., 248, 8408, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)43148-7 · DOI
  9. Brown, 1973, J. Biol. Chem., 248, 4731, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)43725-3 · DOI
  10. Havel, 1955, J. Clin. Invest., 34, 1345, 10.1172/JCI103182 · DOI
  11. Radding, 1960, J. Clin. Invest., 39, 1560, 10.1172/JCI104177 · DOI
  12. Wilson, 1972, J. Clin. Invest., 51, 1450, 10.1172/JCI106941 · DOI
  13. Lowry, 1951, J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 · DOI
  14. Rothblat, 1971, J. Lipid Res., 12, 647, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)39451-7 · DOI
  15. Rothblat, 1971, Exp. Cell Res., 67, 436, 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90429-0 · DOI
  16. Avigan, 1970, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 218, 381, 10.1016/0005-2760(70)90162-1 · DOI
  17. Kandutsch, 1970, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 140, 122, 10.1016/0003-9861(70)90016-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1974-11
Volume
249
Issue
22
Pages
7306-7314
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
413
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review