The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Precise excision of the cellulose binding domains from two Cellulomonas fimi cellulases by a homologous protease and the effect on catalysis.
Open accessAbstract
An endo-beta-1,4-glucanase (CenA) and an exo-beta-1,4-glucanase (Cex) were prepared from Escherichia coli expressing recombinant DNA of the cellulolytic bacterium Cellulomonas fimi. Purification was facilitated by the high affinities of these enzymes for cellulose. An extracellular C. fimi protease cleaved both enzymes in vivo in a highly specific manner. The affinity of the parent enzyme for cellulose was contained independently in an amino-terminal fragment (p20) of CenA and a carboxyl-terminal fragment (p8) of Cex. These fragments contained homologous amino acid sequences which were proposed to comprise cellulose binding domains. Corresponding fragments, p30 from CenA and p35 from Cex, which were unable to bind to cellulose, contained catalytic domains. In both enzymes, the two functional domains were joined by a hinge region consisting solely of prolyl and threonyl residues. The binding domain was excised from CenA by proteolytic cleavage immediately adjacent to the carboxyl terminus of this hinge. Cex was cleaved at an exactly analogous site. p30 and p35 retained several of the catalytic functions of their parent enzymes. However, p30 was less active than intact CenA against microcrystalline cellulose implying a critical role for the binding domain of CenA in the hydrolysis of crystalline substrate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhang, Y. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2004) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.20282 · Cited by 1,893
Domains in microbial beta-1, 4-glycanases: sequence conservation, function, and enzyme families
Gilkes, N. R., Henrissat, B., Kilburn, D. G., Miller, R. C., & Warren, R. A. J. (1991) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.55.2.303-315.1991 · Cited by 961
Self-citationPayne, C. M., Knott, B. C., Mayes, H. B., Hansson, H., Himmel, M. E., Sandgren, M., Ståhlberg, J., & Beckham, G. T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500351c · Cited by 855
Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH?
Russell, J. B., & Wilson, D. B. (1996) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(96)76510-4 · Cited by 628
Carbohydrate Binding Modules: Biochemical Properties and Novel Applications
Shoseyov, O., Shani, Z., & Levy, I. (2006) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00028-05 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilkes, N. R., Warren, R. A., Miller, R. C., & Kilburn, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-07
- Volume
- 263
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 10401-10407
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1528246310
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precise excision of the cellulose binding domains from two Cellulomonas fimi cellulases by a homologous protease and the effect on catalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81530-2
- The paper
- Gilkes, N. R., Warren, R. A., Miller, R. C., & Kilburn, D. G. (1988). Precise excision of the cellulose binding domains from two Cellulomonas fimi cellulases by a homologous protease and the effect on catalysis. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)81530-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.