The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydroxyl free radical is not the main active species in site-specific DNA damage induced by copper (II) ion and hydrogen peroxide
Open accessAbstract
Site-specific DNA damage by Cu(II) plus H2O2 was investigated by a DNA-sequencing technique. Cu(II) plus H2O2 induced strong DNA cleavage even without piperidine treatment. Piperidine-labile sites were induced frequently at thymine and guanine residues and rarely at adenine residue. A Cu(I)-specific chelating agent, bathocuproine, inhibited the DNA damage. Neither ethanol nor mannitol inhibited it. Of alcohols, tertbutyl alcohol, having relatively low reactivity to hydroxyl free radical, inhibited the DNA damage most strongly. Sodium azide and 1,4-diazobicyclo[2.2.2]octane completely inhibited cleavages at residues of the bases other than guanine. Tris inhibited the DNA damage. The enhancing effect of D2O on DNA damage was not observed. ESR studies using 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) showed that the hydroxyl radical adduct of DMPO was formed during the reaction of Cu(II) with H2O2, and that the addition of sodium formate produced the CO2- radical adduct of DMPO more efficiently than expected. ESR studies showed that the nitroxide radical was formed from 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidone in the presence of Cu(II) plus H2O2, indicating the formation of singlet oxygen or its equivalent. The effects of scavengers on DNA damage have considerable correlation with the effects of scavengers on the nitroxide radical production and DMPO.OH formation. The results suggest that the main active species causing DNA damage are more likely copper-peroxide complexes, with similar reactivity to singlet oxygen and/or hydroxyl radical rather than hydroxyl free radical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oxidative Nucleobase Modifications Leading to Strand Scission
Burrows, C. J., & Muller, J. G. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960421s · Cited by 1,736
Reactions of oxyl radicals with DNA
Breen, A. P., & Murphy, J. A. (1995) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/0891-5849(94)00209-3 · Cited by 1,038
Pogozelski, W. K., & Tullius, T. D. (1998) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960437i · Cited by 1,018
Site‐specific DNA damage at GGG sequence by oxidative stress may accelerate telomere shortening
Oikawa, S., & Kawanishi, S. (1999) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00748-6 · Cited by 435
Self-citationInduction of oxidative DNA damage by carcinogenic metals
Bal, W., & Kasprzak, K. S. (2002) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-4274(01)00483-0 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamamoto, K., & Kawanishi, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1989-09
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 15435-15440
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1575560358
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydroxyl free radical is not the main active species in site-specific DNA damage induced by copper (II) ion and hydrogen peroxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)84847-0
- The paper
- Yamamoto, K., & Kawanishi, S. (1989). Hydroxyl free radical is not the main active species in site-specific DNA damage induced by copper (II) ion and hydrogen peroxide. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)84847-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.