Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A comparison of the amino acid sequences of rabbit skeletal muscle alpha- and beta-tropomyosins.

Open access
Mak, A.S., Smillie, L.B., Stewart, G.R.·1980·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Elucidation of the complete amino acid sequence of rabbit skeletal beta-tropomyosin has shown that it has the same number of residues (284) per chain as the alpha component from the same source. The presence of more than one form of beta-tropomyosin was indicated by the detection of heterogeneity at 11 positions in the sequence. The ratio of the major form to the minor form(s) was estimated to be about 10:1. Of the 39 amino acid residue differences in the major alpha and beta forms, most involve chemically similar residues with only two leading to a more negative net charge on the beta form (Ser-229 to glutamic acid and His-276 to asparagine). These replacements do not significantly affect the repeating heptapeptide pattern of nonpolar and polar residues in tropomyosin nor the 14-fold periodicity of acidic and outer nonpolar residues implicated in its binding to F-actin. The larger number of substitutions in the COOH-terminal half of the protein is reflected in differences in the smoothed alpha-helix parameters of the beta-tropomyosin sequence when compared with that of the alpha component. These differences may be related to a lower binding affinity of beta-tropomyosin to troponin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)85753-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Mak, A. S., Smillie, L. B., & Stewart, G. R.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980-04
Volume
255
Issue
8
Pages
3647-3655
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1495596945
Cited by
182
References
1
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of the amino acid sequences of rabbit skeletal muscle alpha- and beta-tropomyosins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)85753-8
The paper
Mak, A. S., Smillie, L. B., & Stewart, G. R. (1980). A comparison of the amino acid sequences of rabbit skeletal muscle alpha- and beta-tropomyosins. Journal of Biological Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)85753-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.