The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Test-retest reliability of three aphasia tests: Performance of non-brain-damaged older adults
Abstract
This study was designed to assess the test-retest reliability of three aphasia tests. The Auditory Comprehension Test for Sentences (ACTS), the Boston Naming Test (BNT), and the Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia (RCBA) were administered on two separate occasions to 31 non-brain-damaged adults aged 50 to 76 years. The results showed acceptable score stability for all three aphasia tests. Sixty-eight percent of the time, older non-brain-damaged adults would be expected to score within 4.0% or less of the total number of test items on repeated testing.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“WAB-AQ summary ESs (Within group: 5.03; Between group: 5.05), were equivalent to its SEM of 5, which has been framed as a metric of clinically meaningful improvement.40–42”
From Benchmarks of Significant Change After Aphasia Rehabilitation (2019) · cites this paper as [40]
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., Weıntraub, S., & Segal, O. (2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,378
Borkowski, J. G., Benton, A. L., & Spreen, O. (1967) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(67)90015-2 · Cited by 1,324
Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3602.338 · Cited by 800
Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, J. P. (1987) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/0278-2626(87)90118-7 · Cited by 651
Clack, T. D. (1979) · Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/archotol.1979.00790220063015 · Cited by 153
Normative data on the boston maming test for a group of normal older adults
van Gorp, W. G., Satz, P., Kiersch, M. E., & Henry, R. R. (1986) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/01688638608405189 · Cited by 138
Nicholas, L. E., Brookshire, R. H., MacLennan, D. L., Schumacher, J. G., & Porrazzo, S. A. (1989) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038908249023 · Cited by 96
Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia-2
Knollman-Porter, K. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_9023 · Cited by 72
The Notion of Clinically Significant Change
Bain, B. A., & Dollaghan, C. A. (1991) · Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/0161-1461.2204.264 · Cited by 57
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Naeser, M. A., Martin, P. I., Nicholas, M. L., Baker, E. H., Seekins, H., Kobayashi, M., Théoret, H., Fregni, F., MARIATORMOS, J., & Kurland, J. (2004) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.08.004 · Cited by 557
The robust reliability of neuropsychological measures: meta-analyses of test-retest correlations
Calamia, M., Markon, K., & Tranel, D. (2013) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.809795 · Cited by 207
Kang, E. K., Kim, Y. K., Sohn, H. M., Cohen, L. G., & Paik, N. (2011) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2011-0587 · Cited by 167
Validity of Teleneuropsychological Assessment in Older Patients with Cognitive Disorders
Wadsworth, H. E., Dhima, K., Womack, K. B., Hart, J., Weiner, M., Hynan, L. S., & Cullum, C. M. (2017) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acx140 · Cited by 136
Spreen, O., & Risser, A. H. (1998) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012619322-0/50007-5 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Flanagan, J. L., & Jackson, S. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jackson, Susan T.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-43
- ISSN
- 0021-9924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985420738
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- test-retest reliability, Boston Naming Test, older adults, score stability, aphasia assessment
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aphasia, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
