Stigma on my mind: individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stereotype threat tends to have the most deleterious effects on those for whom the stereotype is the most self-relevant and on those who are most motivated to perform well.
“At the individual level, there is an unfortunate irony associated with the stereotype threat phenomenon: stereotype threat tends to have the most deleterious effects on those for whom the stereotype is the most self-relevant and on those who are most motivated to perform well.”
From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Brown & Pinel, 2003
Women highly conscious of the stigma associated with the category 'woman' were more prone to stereotype threat effects than those lower in stigma consciousness.
“Related, women who were highly conscious of the stigma associated with the category”
From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Brown & Pinel, 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 354
- Authors
- Brown, R. P., & Pinel, E. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Ryan P
- Pinel, Elizabeth C
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 626-633
- ISSN
- 0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048844171
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 37.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- stereotype threat, stigma consciousness, gender stereotypes, individual differences, self-consciousness, mathematics achievement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
