Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 714

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Colorimetric determination of free fatty acids in biological fluids

Open access
Itaya, Koichi, Ui, Michio·1965·Journal of Lipid Research

Abstract

Following the introduction by Duncombe of a colorimetric micromethod for the determination of free fatty acids (FFA) dissolved in chloroform, we studied the optimum conditions for chloroform extraction of FFA from blood or other biological fluids. A degree and rate of extraction similar to those with Dole's extraction mixture were obtained.Phospholipids are not extracted by the procedure described. As little as 0.2 ml of whole blood, instead of serum or plasma, can serve as a FFA sample in the subsequent colorimetric determination, which has been modified to render it simpler and more sensitive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)39633-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 714

Metadata

Authors
Itaya, K., & Ui, M.
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1965-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
16-20
ISSN
0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2289466277
Cited by
714
References
0
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Colorimetric determination of free fatty acids in biological fluids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)39633-4
The paper
Itaya, K., & Ui, M. (1965). Colorimetric determination of free fatty acids in biological fluids. Journal of Lipid Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)39633-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.