Cited by 58Lipid metabolism and disordersLipid metabolism and biosynthesisFatty Acid Research and Health

Spinal cord of the rat contains more lipoprotein lipase than other brain regions

Open access
Bessesen, DH, Richards, CL, Etienne, J, Goers, JW, Eckel, RH·1993·Journal of Lipid Research

Abstract

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is important for the delivery of triglyceride fatty acids (TGFA) to a variety of tissues. We have used measurements of heparin-releasable LPL activity, immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and Northern analysis to more fully characterize the location of LPL within the entire central nervous system (CNS) of the rat. Surprisingly, the levels of LPL activity and mRNA in the caudal spinal cord were 5- to 10-times higher than those found in any other area of the brain, levels similar to those found in adipose tissue or skeletal muscle. A number of cell types including neurons in the hippocampus, Purkinje cells of the cerebellum, and cells deep within the cortex were identified as sources of LPL mRNA. LPL protein was found within many vascular structures throughout the CNS, and within Purkinje cells. The strongest immunostaining was around nerve rootlets associated with the caudal spinal cord. Feeding studies were carried out with [14C]oleic acid to see whether CNS LPL functioned in the uptake of TGFA. These studies demonstrated uptake of chylomicron triglyceride fatty acids throughout the CNS. The localization of LPL within these structures suggests that the uptake of triglyceride fatty acids is an integral part of normal lipid metabolism of the central nervous system and may be important in regulating feeding behavior and/or maintaining normal neuronal function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)40750-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 35 · Cited by 58

Authors
Bessesen, D., Richards, C., Etienne, J., Goers, J., & Eckel, R.
Affiliations
Sorbonne Université (FR)
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-02
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
229-238
ISSN
0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346631209
Cited by
58
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Lipid Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5f32dk008329-02)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-42266, DK-08329, R01DK042266)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
Keywords
lipoprotein lipase, spinal cord, Purkinje cells, hippocampus, cerebellum, feeding behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Carbon Radioisotopes, Dietary Fats, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Heparin, Hippocampus, Immunohistochemistry, Kinetics, Lipoprotein Lipase, Oleic Acids, RNA, Messenger, Spinal Cord, Blotting, Northern, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, In Situ Hybridization, Oleic Acid, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review