Effectiveness of an antihistamine-decongestant combination for young children with the common cold: a randomized, controlled clinical trial
Open accessAbstract
We tested the hypothesis that antihistamine-decongestant combinations cause no clinically significant relief of the symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections in young children by randomly assigning 96 children to one of three treatment groups: antihistamine-decongestant, placebo, and no treatment. There were no differences among the three study groups in the proportion of children considered "better" overall by the parent 48 hours after the initial assessment (drug, 67%; placebo, 71%; no treatment, 57%; p = 0.53). There were no differences among groups in individual or composite symptom score changes. Two thirds of parents whose children were eligible for the drug trial believed that their child needed medicine for cold symptoms. In the proportion of parents believing that their child needed medicine, there was no difference between those who consented to participate and those who refused. Parents who wanted medicine at the initial visit reported more improvement at follow-up, regardless of whether the child received drug, placebo, or no treatment. We conclude that there is no clinically significant improvement in symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection, including no significant placebo effect, in young children for whom an antihistamine-decongestant is prescribed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Hutton 1991, there was no difference between groups in the improvement of symptoms (P = 0.51).
“In Hutton 1991, there was no difference between groups in the improvement of symptoms (P = 0.51).”
From Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold (2022) · cites this paper as Hutton 1991
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 28 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Hutton, N., Wilson, M. H., Mellits, E. D., Baumgardner, R., Wissow, L. S., Bonuccelli, C., Holtzman, N. A., & DeAngelis, C.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hutton, Nancy
- ORCID
- Wissow, Lawrence S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pediatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-130
- ISSN
- 0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047899642
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 10.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Keywords
- common cold, upper respiratory tract infection, young children, symptom relief, placebo effect, parental expectations
- MeSH terms
- Brompheniramine, Bronchodilator Agents, Child, Preschool, Common Cold, Drug Combinations, Histamine H1 Antagonists, Humans, Infant, Parents, Phenylephrine, Phenylpropanolamine, Pseudoephedrine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review