Cited by 124Pediatric health and respiratory diseasesRespiratory viral infections researchPharmaceutical studies and practices

Effectiveness of an antihistamine-decongestant combination for young children with the common cold: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Open access
Hutton, Nancy, Wilson, Modena Hoover, Mellits, E. David, Baumgardner, Rosemary, Wissow, Lawrence S., Bonuccelli, Catherine, Holtzman, Neil A., DeAngelis, Catherine·1991·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that antihistamine-decongestant combinations cause no clinically significant relief of the symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections in young children by randomly assigning 96 children to one of three treatment groups: antihistamine-decongestant, placebo, and no treatment. There were no differences among the three study groups in the proportion of children considered "better" overall by the parent 48 hours after the initial assessment (drug, 67%; placebo, 71%; no treatment, 57%; p = 0.53). There were no differences among groups in individual or composite symptom score changes. Two thirds of parents whose children were eligible for the drug trial believed that their child needed medicine for cold symptoms. In the proportion of parents believing that their child needed medicine, there was no difference between those who consented to participate and those who refused. Parents who wanted medicine at the initial visit reported more improvement at follow-up, regardless of whether the child received drug, placebo, or no treatment. We conclude that there is no clinically significant improvement in symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection, including no significant placebo effect, in young children for whom an antihistamine-decongestant is prescribed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81865-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 28 · Cited by 124

Authors
Hutton, N., Wilson, M. H., Mellits, E. D., Baumgardner, R., Wissow, L. S., Bonuccelli, C., Holtzman, N. A., & DeAngelis, C.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Hutton, Nancy
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-01
Volume
118
Issue
1
Pages
125-130
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047899642
Cited by
124
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
common cold, upper respiratory tract infection, young children, symptom relief, placebo effect, parental expectations
MeSH terms
Brompheniramine, Bronchodilator Agents, Child, Preschool, Common Cold, Drug Combinations, Histamine H1 Antagonists, Humans, Infant, Parents, Phenylephrine, Phenylpropanolamine, Pseudoephedrine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review