Is an antihistamine-decongestant combination effective in temporarily relieving symptoms of the common cold in preschool children?
Abstract
Objective To determine whether an antihistamine-decongestant combination (ADC) is superior to placebo in temporarily relieving symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection (URI) in preschool children. Design Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Setting Four pediatric offices in the Seattle, Wash, area. Participants Children 6 months through 5 years of age with a URI of less than 7 days' duration. Methods Children were randomly assigned to receive an ADC (brompheniramine maleate-phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride) or placebo as needed for URI symptoms. Two hours after each dose of study medication, changes in the child's runny nose, nasal congestion, cough, and sleep status were assessed by means of a standardized questionnaire. Results A total of 175 responses were recorded for 59 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in symptom improvement between the ADC and the placebo group (runny nose, p = 0.48; nasal congestion, p = 0.94; cough, p = 0.66). However, the proportion of children asleep 2 hours after receiving the ADC was significantly higher than the proportion receiving placebo (46.6% vs 26.5%; p = 0.01). Results were unchanged after control for the correlated nature of repeated responses, age, symptom duration, use of acetaminophen, time that the medication was given, and parental desire for medication. Conclusions The ADC was equivalent to placebo in providing temporary relief of URI symptoms in preschool children. However, the ADC…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Clemens 1997, there was no difference between groups in the proportion of responses reporting an improvement in runny nose or nasal congestion (P = 0.54 and P = 0.94, respectively).
“In Clemens 1997, there was no difference between groups in the proportion of responses reporting an improvement in runny nose or nasal congestion (P = 0.54 and P = 0.94, respectively).”
From Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold (2022) · cites this paper as Clemens 1997
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 18 · Cited by 95
- Authors
- Clemens, C. J., Taylor, J. A., Almquist, J. R., Quinn, H. C., Mehta, A., & Naylor, G. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Pediatrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 463-466
- ISSN
- 0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018077130
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Keywords
- common cold, upper respiratory tract infection, preschool children, brompheniramine, phenylpropanolamine, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, cough, sleep, sedative effects, symptom relief
- MeSH terms
- Brompheniramine, Child, Preschool, Common Cold, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Female, Histamine H1 Antagonists, Humans, Infant, Male, Phenylephrine, Phenylpropanolamine, Time Factors, Pseudoephedrine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review