Cited by 68Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

A controlled trial of health promotion programs in 11-year-olds using physical activity “enrichment” for higher risk children

Burke, V., Milligan, R.A.K., Thompson, C., Taggart, A.C., Dunbar, D.L., Spencer, M.J., Medland, A., Gracey, M.P. +2 more·1998·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the short and long term benefits of a school and home based physical activity "enrichment" program for children at higher risk of cardiovascular disease as identified by cluster analysis.Study design During two 10-week school terms, 800 11-year-olds took part in a randomized controlled trial with the standard physical activity and nutrition program in six schools, the standard program in a further seven schools but with the addition of physical activity enrichment for higher risk children in those schools, and no program in five control schools. Cluster analysis identifying the 29% or so highest risk children used systolic blood pressure, percent body fat, physical fitness, and blood cholesterol.Results Fitness improved significantly in program schools, particularly with enrichment in higher risk boys. Substantial improvements persisted 6 months later in girls from program schools. At "Enrichment" schools, cholesterol showed significant benefits in higher risk girls and, 6 months later, in both boys and higher risk girls. Sodium intake and, in girls, subscapular skinfolds were lower in "Enrichment" schools when the program ended, but not 6 months later.Conclusion Two-semester health programs with physical activity enrichment for higher risk children can produce benefits sustained for at least 6 months. Improvements extend to lower risk children exposed indirectly to the enrichment. Attenuation of effects on diet and body composition in the longer-term suggest the need for on-going programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70315-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 68

Authors
Burke, V., Milligan, R. A. K., Thompson, C., Taggart, A. C., Dunbar, D. L., Spencer, M. J., Medland, A., Gracey, M. P., Vandongen, R., & Beilin, L. J.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
132
Issue
5
Pages
840-848
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986025982
Cited by
68
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
health promotion programs, cardiovascular risk, school-based intervention, home-based intervention, children, physical fitness, serum cholesterol, blood pressure, fat mass, sodium intake, skinfold thickness, nutrition, sex differences
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Child, Diet, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Physical Fitness, Risk Factors, School Health Services, Sex Factors, Social Class, Exercise, Cluster Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review