Cited by 20Advancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Importance of Chronopharmacokinetics in Design and Evaluation of Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems

Gries, Jean-Michel, Benowitz, Neal, Verotta, Davide·1998·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

Circadian and meal effects on nicotine kinetics determine in part blood nicotine concentrations and in doing so may influence cigarette smoking behavior throughout the day. We have shown previously that nicotine clearance varies by approximately 17% (from peak to through) due to diurnal factors throughout the day and that meals increase nicotine clearance by about 42%. Until now pharmacokinetic analyses of nicotine absorption from patches have assumed a constant clearance of nicotine over 24 hr. Using 11 individual kinetic estimates from a previous study, we analyzed plasma nicotine concentrations vs. time data of two nicotine patch studies, and conducted a set of simulations to determine the extent to which time-varying kinetics would influence the design of transdermal drug delivery systems, intented to maintain a constant plasma nicotine concentration over 24 hr. Not incorporating time-varying kinetics leads to biased estimates of the delivery rate of the nicotine patches, and increases the variability in the delivery rates estimates. The hypothetical transdermal drug delivery systems designed assuming constant nicotine clearance results in a systematical underdosing during the first 12 hr after beginning therapy. The transdermal drug delivery systems obtained assuming the correct time-varying clearance shows three components: 1) an early high delivery rate, followed by 2) a rather constant, but slightly decreasing at night, release rate and 3) transient increases in deliv…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(24)37450-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 20

Authors
Gries, J.-M., Benowitz, N., & Verotta, D.
Affiliations
San Francisco General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Verotta, Davide
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
285
Issue
2
Pages
457-463
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154214026
Cited by
20
References
7
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50da001696-18, 5r29gm051197-05)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA02277, DA-01696)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM51197)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
chronopharmacokinetics, nicotine, nicotine patch, nicotine clearance, circadian rhythm, food effect, plasma nicotine concentration, dosage regimen design, nicotine replacement therapy, smoking cessation
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Humans, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Nicotine, Drug Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review