The DOI matches its Crossref record.
COMPARATIVE ASSAYS OF ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS IN MICE AND RATS
Abstract
Eight clinically employed antiepileptic drugs have been tested for anticonvulsant potency at their time of peak effect in mice and rats by a battery of four assay procedures, as follows : maximal electroshock seizure pattern, minimal electroshock seizure threshold, hyponatremic electroshock seizure threshold and Metrazol seizure threshold. In addition, minimal neurological toxicity was determined. On the basis of the results obtained, the following conclusions have been reached: 1) The apparent discrepancies in drug potencies reported for mice and rats can be explained in a large measure on the basis of assay technic, especially by failure to test the drugs at the time of peak effect in the two species. 2) When proper precautions in technics are observed, the profiles of anticonvulsant activity of the various clinically employed antiepileptics are reasonably similar in the two species. 3) Most of the drugs tested were more potent in rats by the maximal electroshock seizure pattern test, and more potent in mice by the remaining three assay tests. 4) In general, phenobarbital was most potent and most toxic and Tridione, Paradione and Phenurone were least potent and least toxic by all tests in both species. 5) The mouse is as suitable as the rat for anticonvulsant screening purposes and in some respects this species is to be preferred. However, because of reasons presented in the discussion, it would seem prudent to use more than one species for the definitive comparison of antiepileptic agents. Attention has been called to the details of anticonvulsant assay procedures in mice and rats and the important differences in assay technic in the two species. In addition, a number of special precautions have been described, the observance of which contributes to the ease and precision of assay. Caution in the interpretation of anticonvulsant assay data is urged. Unless the candidate antiepileptic agents under investigation are chemically related to compounds known to possess clinical anticonvulsant usefulness, the assay results obtained by currently available methods may have only limited value for predicting clinical efficacy or specificity for various seizure types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Löscher, W. (2017) · Neurochemical Research · doi:10.1007/s11064-017-2222-z · Cited by 367
Enhanced anticonvulsant activity of neuroactive steroids in a rat model of catamenial epilepsy
Reddy, D. S., & Rogawski, M. A. (2001) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.10200.x · Cited by 130
Chen, C. R., Qu, W. M., Qiu, M. H., Xu, X. H., Yao, M. H., Urade, Y., & Huang, Z. L. (2007) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2007.06.017 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Swinyard, E. A., Brown, W. C., & Goodman, L. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1952-11
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 319-330
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2259516905
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMPARATIVE ASSAYS OF ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS IN MICE AND RATS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)05100-6
- The paper
- Swinyard, E. A., Brown, W. C., & Goodman, L. S. (1952). COMPARATIVE ASSAYS OF ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS IN MICE AND RATS. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)05100-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.