Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Aminoalkylindole analogs: cannabimimetic activity of a class of compounds structurally distinct from delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Compton, D R, Gold, L H, Ward, S J, Balster, R L, Martin, B R·1992·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

Six novel aminoalkylindole analogs, related structurally to the dual cyclooxygenase inhibitor and nonopioid analgesic pravadoline, were evaluated in the mouse to determine whether their pharmacological profile of activity was similar to that exhibited by delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC). Analog I (C2-H; C3-methoxy-benzoyl) reduced locomotion, but had no other effects (hypothermia, antinociception or ring-immobility) up to 21 mumol/kg. Analogs II and III (C3-naphthoyl; C2-H and C2-methyl, respectively) possessed all properties exhibited by delta 9-THC with ED50 values ranging from 0.68 to 18 mumol/kg. Analog IV (C2-methyl; C3-anthroyl) was devoid of activity. Stereoselectivity was demonstrated by the fact that (+)-WIN-55,212 (one isomer of a semirigid derivative possessing C2-H and C3-naphthoyl substituents) was moderately potent in all tests (ED50 values ranging from 0.25-23 mumol/kg), but (-)-WIN-55,212 was inactive up to 57 mumol/kg. Active aminoalkylindole compounds were generally least effective in the production of hypothermia. Analogs were also evaluated for their ability to produce delta 9-THC-like discriminative stimulus effects in rats. The ED50 for delta 9-THC as a discriminative stimuli for this model was 1.9 mumol/kg. Analog II and III and (+)-WIN-55,212 produced delta 9-THC-like discriminative effects with ED50 values ranging from 0.33 to 4.3 mumol/kg, whereas analogs I, IV and (-)-WIN-55,212 did not. Although reported to be cannabinoid receptor antagonists in vitro, neither analog I, analog IV nor (-)-WIN-55,212 (at 20 mumol/kg) antagonized the in vivo pharmacological effects of delta 9-THC in the mouse or rat.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(25)10448-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Compton, D. R., Gold, L. H., Ward, S. J., Balster, R. L., & Martin, B. R.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-12
Volume
263
Issue
3
Pages
1118-1126
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1911828734
Cited by
288
References
0
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aminoalkylindole analogs: cannabimimetic activity of a class of compounds structurally distinct from delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)10448-5
The paper
Compton, D. R., Gold, L. H., Ward, S. J., Balster, R. L., & Martin, B. R. (1992). Aminoalkylindole analogs: cannabimimetic activity of a class of compounds structurally distinct from delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)10448-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.