The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of different brain structures in the expression of the physical morphine withdrawal syndrome.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the neuroanatomical regions implicated in the expression of the physical signs of morphine withdrawal by using local intracerebral injections of methylnaloxonium in dependent rats. Guide cannulas were implanted and aimed at the lateral ventricle, nucleus accumbens, central amygdala, anterior hypothalamus, medial thalamus, periaqueductal gray matter, locus coeruleus and nucleus raphe magnus. After surgery, rats were made physically dependent by s.c. implantation of two 75-mg morphine pellets. Methylnaloxonium, a quaternary derivative of naloxone (31-1000 ng), was administered 72 hr after pellet implantation. Methylnaloxonium administered i.c.v. induced a withdrawal syndrome similar to systemic naloxone, although several signs such as diarrhea, salivation, lacrimation and rhinorrhea did not appear, suggesting possible peripheral mediation. The most sensitive site for methylnaloxonium-precipitated withdrawal was the locus coeruleus. Signs such as jumping, rearing and locomotor activity were particularly frequent after methylnaloxonium injections into the locus coeruleus. Rearing and locomotor activity were also strongly increased after methylnaloxonium administration into the periaqueductal gray matter. Wet dog shakes were mainly observed after methylnaloxonium administration into the anterior preoptic hypothalamus and nucleus raphe magnus. Injections of methylnaloxonium into the amygdala produced a weak withdrawal syndrome, and the nucleus accumbens and medial thalamus were the least sensitive structures. These results suggest that the locus coeruleus, and secondarily the periaqueductal gray matter, play an important role in the precipitation of the physical signs of opiate withdrawal, mainly in the expression of its motor component. The expression of other signs of withdrawal appear to be multisite determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The amygdala: vigilance and emotion
Davis, M., & Whalen, P. J. (2001) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4000812 · Cited by 2,882
Molecular mechanisms of drug addiction
Nestler, E. J. (2004) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.06.031 · Cited by 1,108
Reward Processing by the Opioid System in the Brain
Le Merrer, J., Becker, J. A. J., Befort, K., & Kieffer, B. L. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00005.2009 · Cited by 1,013
Cellular and Synaptic Adaptations Mediating Opioid Dependence
Williams, J. T., Christie, M. J., & Manzoni, O. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.1.299 · Cited by 848
Neurobiological similarities in depression and drug dependence: a self-medication hypothesis
Markou, A. (1998) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(97)00113-9 · Cited by 767
Metadata
- Authors
- Maldonado, R., Stinus, L., Gold, L. H., & Koob, G. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 261
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 669-677
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2214956132
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of different brain structures in the expression of the physical morphine withdrawal syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)11090-2
- The paper
- Maldonado, R., Stinus, L., Gold, L. H., & Koob, G. F. (1992). Role of different brain structures in the expression of the physical morphine withdrawal syndrome. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)11090-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.