The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pharmacological profile of a series of bicyclic cannabinoid analogs: classification as cannabimimetic agents.
Abstract
Opening of the pyran ring of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) produces cannabidiol, a bicyclic cannabinoid devoid of many pharmacological properties produced by delta 8-THC or delta 9-THC. Interestingly, the bicyclic compound CP-47,497 (VI) has been described as producing many of the pharmacological effects produced by delta 9-THC, and another related bicyclic analog CP-55,940 (XIV) has been used to successfully define a cannabinoid binding site. A series of 16 bicyclic analogs of VI and XIV were evaluated and compared with the pharmacological profile of cannabidiol, delta 8-THC and delta 9-THC. The goals of the studies described herein were to determine whether these bicyclic analogs possess similar pharmacological properties of delta 9-THC, to compare pharmacological activity after s.c. and i.v. administration, and to evaluate the structure-activity relationship of this series of analogs for further insight into cannabinoid mechanism of action. Each analog was evaluated for its ability to produce hypoactivity, hypothermia, antinociception and catalepsy in mice. The ED50 values generated from these assays were averaged to provide an index of activity. The ED50 values for delta 9-THC varied from 1.0 to 1.5 mg/kg, giving an overall index of activity of 1.3. The index for delta 8-THC was 6.0, making this isomer 4-fold less potent. Although several bicyclic analogs (V, VI, VII, VIII, XI, XII, XIV and XVI) proved to be truly cannabimimetic, three (IV, IX and X) were sufficiently unique to be classified as noncannabimimetic. The index of activity of cannabimimetic bicyclic analogs varied from 0.2 to 2.2, although some minor differences between the bicyclics and delta 9-THC exist.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechoulam, R., Ben-Shabat, S., Hanus, L., Ligumsky, M., Kaminski, N. E., Schatz, A. R., Gopher, A., Almog, S., Martin, B. R., Compton, D. R., et al. (1995) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0006-2952(95)00109-d · Cited by 2,913
Self-citationInternational Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of Cannabinoid Receptors
Howlett, A. C., Barth, F., Bonner, T. I., Cabral, G., Casellas, P., Devane, W. A., Felder, C. C., Herkenham, M., Mackie, K., Martin, B. R., et al. (2002) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.54.2.161 · Cited by 2,819
Self-citationD'Souza, D. C., Perry, E., MacDougall, L., Ammerman, Y., Cooper, T., Wu, Y.-T., Braley, G., Gueorguieva, R., & Krystal, J. H. (2004) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300496 · Cited by 1,024
Cannabinoid receptors and pain
Pertwee, R. G. (2001) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00031-9 · Cited by 741
D’Souza, D. C., Abi-Saab, W. M., Madonick, S., Forselius-Bielen, K., Doersch, A., Braley, G., Gueorguieva, R., Cooper, T. B., & Krystal, J. H. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.006 · Cited by 617
Metadata
- Authors
- Compton, D. R., Johnson, M. R., Melvin, L. S., & Martin, B. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 260
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-209
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1921386713
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacological profile of a series of bicyclic cannabinoid analogs: classification as cannabimimetic agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)11216-0
- The paper
- Compton, D. R., Johnson, M. R., Melvin, L. S., & Martin, B. R. (1992). Pharmacological profile of a series of bicyclic cannabinoid analogs: classification as cannabimimetic agents. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)11216-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.