Paracetamol exerts a spinal antinociceptive effect involving an indirect interaction with 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptors: in vivo and in vitro evidence.
Abstract
Rats (Sprague-Dawley), submitted to a mechanical noxious stimulus (paw pressure), were tested to determine 1) the antinociceptive effects of p.o. (200, 400 and 800 mg/kg), i.v. (50, 100, 200 and 300 mg/kg) and intrathecal (i.t.) (100 and 200 micrograms/rat) administrations of paracetamol; 2) the influence of i.t. administered tropisetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist (0.5, 1 or 10 micrograms/rat) on paracetamol-induced antinociception; 3) the influence of indomethacin (25 mg/kg s.c.), naloxone (10 micrograms/rat i.t.) and yohimbine (1 mg/kg i.v.) on the effect of paracetamol (200 mg/kg i.v.) to determine the involvement of prostaglandins, opioids and alpha-2 adrenoceptors. The displacement by paracetamol of radioligand binding to various receptors was also investigated. Paracetamol induced a significant antinociceptive effect after p.o., i.v. and i.t. administration. A total inhibition of the effect of paracetamol, administered p.o. or i.t., occurred at the dose of 0.5 microgram/rat of tropisetron, whereas 10 micrograms/rat of this antagonist was needed to totally inhibit the action of i.v. administered paracetamol. Indomethacin, naloxone and yohimbine failed to modify paracetamol antinociceptive action. In vitro studies failed to show any binding of paracetamol to 5-HT3 and several other receptors and to 5-HT uptake sites. It is concluded that paracetamol has a central antinociceptive effect, based on an indirect involvement of spinal 5-HT3 receptors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selective blockade of particular serotonergic receptors abolishes the analgesic actions of paracetamol in acute models of pain.
“Decades of research have provided evidence on the significance of this pathway to mediate the analgesic action of paracetamol as it has been shown that selective blockade of particular serotonergic receptors to abolish the analgesic actions of paracetamol in acute models of pain.”
From Paracetamol (acetaminophen): A familiar drug with an unexplained mechanism of action (2021) · cites this paper as [79]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 107
- Authors
- Pelissier, T., Alloui, A., Caussade, F., Dubray, C., Cloarec, A., Lavarenne, J., & Eschalier, A.
- Affiliations
- Université Clermont Auvergne (FR)
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-14
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138083758
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- paracetamol, antinociception, spinal cord, 5-HT3 receptor, serotonin, tropisetron, intrathecal administration, mechanical nociception, prostaglandins, opioid receptors, alpha2-adrenoceptors, receptor binding
- MeSH terms
- Acetaminophen, Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Naloxone, Pain Measurement, Radioligand Assay, Receptors, Serotonin, Vocalization, Animal, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review