The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pharmacogenetic determination of the effects of codeine and prediction of drug interactions.
Abstract
To define the differences in codeine pharmacodynamics in extensive (EMs) and poor (PMs) metabolizers of debrisoquin and to determine whether the inhibition of codeine's metabolism by quinidine produces phenotypically dependent pharmacodynamic changes, we studied 16 healthy nonsmoking males, 10 EMs and 6 PMs of debrisoquin. The subjects received in random double-blind fashion 120 mg of codeine plus placebo, 120 mg of codeine plus 100 mg of quinidine and 100 mg of quinidine plus placebo. Blood was obtained over 24 hr and urine was collected for 48 hr. Respiratory, psychomotor and pupillary effects of codeine were greater in the EMs than in the PMs (P < .01). Morphine and morphine metabolites were detectable only in plasma from EMs. Codeine metabolic clearance by O-demethylation was almost 200-fold greater in the EMs than in the PMs. After coadministration of quinidine, morphine and morphine metabolites were not detectable in the plasma of either phenotype and mean (+/- S.E.M.) O-demethylation clearance was reduced in the EMs from 162.7 +/- 36.6 to 17.0 +/- 5.0 ml/min (P < .003), but not in the PMs. The diminished production of morphine in the EMs was associated with significantly reduced respiratory, psychomotor and pupillary effects (P < .01). Thus, CYP2D6 mediated O-demethylation of codeine to morphine is central to its pharmacodynamic effects. Patients who lack CYP2D6 or whose CYP2D6 is inhibited would not be expected to benefit from codeine. Thus, phenotyping for CYP2D6 and the avoidance of CYP2D6 inhibitors is justified in patients with chronic path before initiating long-term therapy with analgesics whose in vivo activation is dependent on CYP2D6 activity (i.e., codeine, hydrocodone and oxycodone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clinical Significance of the Cytochrome P450 2C19 Genetic Polymorphism
Desta, Z., Zhao, X., Shin, J.-G., & Flockhart, D. A. (2002) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200241120-00002 · Cited by 942
Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Clinical Practice
Gardiner, S. J., & Begg, E. J. (2006) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.58.3.6 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Caraco, Y., Sheller, J., & Wood, A. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1165-1174
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1910484136
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacogenetic determination of the effects of codeine and prediction of drug interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)20766-2
- The paper
- Caraco, Y., Sheller, J., & Wood, A. J. (1996). Pharmacogenetic determination of the effects of codeine and prediction of drug interactions. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)20766-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.