The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ANESTHESIA AND THE RESPONSIVENESS OF INDIVIDUAL NEURONS OF THE CAUDATE NUCLEUS OF THE CAT TO ACETYLCHOLINE, NOREPINEPHRINE AND DOPAMINE ADMINISTERED BY MICROELECTROPHORESIS
Abstract
The responsiveness of spontaneously active caudate nucleus neurons to the administration by electrophoresis of ACh, NE and DOPAM as well as of glutamate, dl -homocysteic acid and γ-aminobutyric acid at the site of recording was investigated in unanesthetized, decerebrate cats and in animals variously anesthetized. Most units in the unanesthetized preparations responded to ACh with a facilitation and to NE and DOPAM with a depression of their spontaneous discharge rates; some responded in the opposite direction. Depression by NE and DOPAM on occasion persisted for several minutes, during which facilitatory responses to ACh were greatly reduced. Unit facilitation by ACh was reversibly diminished or suppressed by small to moderate doses of short-acting barbiturates or ether or by the electrophoretic administration of procaine in the vicinity of the recorded neuron, although ACh-induced depression as well as responsiveness to NE, DOPAM, glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid remained unchanged. Depression was the predominant response to ACh of spontaneously active caudate units in fully anesthetized animals and of units which were not spontaneously active in unanesthetized animals but were made to fire by the continuous electrophoretic administration of glutamate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Swerdlow, N. R., & Koob, G. F. (1987) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00047488 · Cited by 674
Cepeda, C., Buchwald, N. A., & Levine, M. S. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.20.9576 · Cited by 554
Robinson, T. E., & Whishaw, I. Q. (1988) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(88)91560-0 · Cited by 517
Effect of barbiturates on ‘quantal’ synaptic transmission in spinal motoneurones
Weakly, J. N. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008898 · Cited by 431
Spontaneous firing patterns of identified spiny neurons in the rat neostriatum
Wilson, C. J., & Groves, P. M. (1981) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(81)90211-0 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloom, F. E., Costa, E., & Salmoiraghi, G. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1965-11
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 244-252
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1648825372
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANESTHESIA AND THE RESPONSIVENESS OF INDIVIDUAL NEURONS OF THE CAUDATE NUCLEUS OF THE CAT TO ACETYLCHOLINE, NOREPINEPHRINE AND DOPAMINE ADMINISTERED BY MICROELECTROPHORESIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)27177-4
- The paper
- Bloom, F. E., Costa, E., & Salmoiraghi, G. C. (1965). ANESTHESIA AND THE RESPONSIVENESS OF INDIVIDUAL NEURONS OF THE CAUDATE NUCLEUS OF THE CAT TO ACETYLCHOLINE, NOREPINEPHRINE AND DOPAMINE ADMINISTERED BY MICROELECTROPHORESIS. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)27177-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.