The DOI matches its Crossref record.
REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN H3-NOREPINEPHRINE AND H3-DOPAMINE UPTAKE INTO RAT BRAIN HOMOGENATES
Abstract
The uptake of DL-H 3 -norepinephrine and H 3 -dopamine has been examined in rat brain homogenates. The greatest amine accumulation by particulate fractions isolated from these homogenates occurred when brains were homogenized in sucrose and incubated with Krebs-Henseleit solution. At amine concentrations ranging from 0.05 µM to 0.80 µM, catecholamine uptake was saturable in all six brain areas examined. H 3 -dopamine accumulation exceeded that of H 3 -norepinephrine at all amino concentrations. In the cerebellum, medulla oblongata-pons, midbrain, cerebral cortex and hypothalamus, the K m for H 3 -norepinephrine uptake was 4.0 x 10 -7 M. In the striatum the K m for H 3 -norepinephrine uptake was 2.0 x 10 -6 M, whereas the K m for H 3 -dopamine uptake in this area was 4.0 x 10 -7 M. The K 1 values for the mutual competitive inhibition of the uptake of norepinephrine and dopamine in the striatum were the same as their K m values. In areas outside the striatum, H 3 -dopamine was accumulated by two uptake systems, with K m values of 0.8 x 10 -7 M (uptake a) and 1.4 x 10 -6 (uptake b), respectively. The K 1 for the inhibition of H 3 -norepinephrine uptake in the cerebral cortex by dopamine was identical with the K m for uptake a, indicating that this high-affinity uptake for dopamine appears to utilize the norepinephrine transport system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Role of Transmitter Uptake Mechanisms in Synaptic Neurotransmission
IVERSEN, L. L. (1971) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1971.tb07066.x · Cited by 772
Lindvall, O., & Bj�rklund, A. (1974) · Histochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf00492041 · Cited by 566
Wong, D. T., Horng, J. S., Bymaster, F. P., Hauser, K. L., & Molloy, B. B. (1974) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(74)90345-2 · Cited by 481
Ritz, M. C., Cone, E. J., & Kuhar, M. J. (1990) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(90)90132-b · Cited by 465
Iversen, L. L., & Johnston, G. A. R. (1971) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1971.tb09600.x · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- SNYDER, S. H., & COYLE, J. T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1969-01
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-86
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2246813284
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN H3-NOREPINEPHRINE AND H3-DOPAMINE UPTAKE INTO RAT BRAIN HOMOGENATES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)28163-0
- The paper
- SNYDER, S. H., & COYLE, J. T. (1969). REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN H3-NOREPINEPHRINE AND H3-DOPAMINE UPTAKE INTO RAT BRAIN HOMOGENATES. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)28163-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.