Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dissociation constants and relative efficacies of agonists acting on alpha adrenergic receptors in rabbit aorta.

Besse, J C, Furchgott, R F·1976·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

The dissociation constants (KA values) of l-norepinephrine (l-NE) and seven other agonists acting on alpha adrenergic receptors in rabbit aorta strips were determined by analysis of concentration-response data before and after fractional inactivation of receptors with Dibenamine. In experiments to determine KA values, propranolol was added to block activation of beta receptors and cocaine to block the neuronal uptake mechanism. The KA of l-NE and the KA of a second agonist, when determined on paired strips from the same aorta, were used to calculate the relative affinity and the relative efficacy (er) of the second agonist as compared to l-NE. The validity of the method used for determining KA and er values was supported by the following findings. 1) The dissociation constant (KB) of the competitive antagonist, phentolamine, determined with each of the agonists, was the same as that determined with l-NE. 2) The KA determined for l-NE was independent of the fraction of active receptors remaining (q) after pretreatment with different concentrations of Dibenamine. 3) The KB of phentolamine determined with l-NE as the agonist was the same before and after fractional inactivation of receptors. 4) After inactivation in paired strips by equal exposures to Dibenamine, the q value determined with each agonist was the same as that determined with l-NE. The mean KA value for l-NE was 3.39 +/- 0.15 X 10(-7) M. The mean relative affinities of the agonists for the alpha receptor were: l-NE, 1;L-EPINEPHRINE, 1.25; L-PHENYLEPHRINE, 0.200; L-norphenylephrine, 0.217; epinine, 0.136; dopamine, 0.0055; l-alpha-methylnorepinephrine, 0.095; dl-alpha-ethylnorepinephrine, 0.0048. The mean er of each agonist was not significantly different from that of l-NE, except for l-norphenylephrine with an e of 0.71, and dl-alpha-ethylnorepinephrine with an er of 0.41. The results are discussed from the standpoint of structure-activity relationships.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(25)30481-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Besse, J. C., & Furchgott, R. F.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1976-04
Volume
197
Issue
1
Pages
66-78
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2259129308
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dissociation constants and relative efficacies of agonists acting on alpha adrenergic receptors in rabbit aorta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)30481-7
The paper
Besse, J. C., & Furchgott, R. F. (1976). Dissociation constants and relative efficacies of agonists acting on alpha adrenergic receptors in rabbit aorta. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)30481-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.