Dynorphin A-(1-13) potently improves the impairment of spontaneous alternation performance induced by the mu-selective opioid receptor agonist DAMGO in mice
Abstract
The effects of i.c.v. injection of the mu-selective opioid receptor agonist DAMGO and the effects of its combination with the endogenous kappa-opioid receptor agonist dynorphin A-(1-13) on memory processes were examined in mice, using spontaneous alternation performance associated with working memory in a Y-maze. DAMGO (10 and/or 30 ng) impaired spontaneous alternation performance and increased total arm entries, which are considered to reflect locomotor activity. beta-Funaltrexamine (5 micrograms, i.c.v.), a mu-selective opioid receptor antagonist, almost completely antagonized the impairment of alternation performance induced by DAMGO (10 ng). Physostigmine (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.), a cholinesterase inhibitor, improved the DAMGO (10 ng)-induced impairment of alternation performance. Dynorphin A-(1-13) (1, 3 and 10 micrograms, i.c.v.) alone was without significant effects on alternation performance. On the other hand, dynorphin A-(1-13) (3 and 10 micrograms) significantly improved the impairment of spontaneous alternation performance induced by DAMGO (10 ng). The effects of dynorphin A-(1-13) (3 micrograms) on the DAMGO-induced impairment of spontaneous alternation were almost completely reversed by pretreatment with nor-binaltorphimine (4 micrograms, i.c.v.), a kappa-selective opioid receptor antagonist. The present results demonstrate that DAMGO impairs alternation performance by activating mu-opioid receptors, whereas dynorphin A-(1-13) attenuates the DAMGO-induced impairment of alternation performance through the mediation of kappa-opioid receptors. These findings suggest that mu- and kappa-opioid systems are fully involved in memory function and have opposite effects on spontaneous alternation performance as it is reflected by working memory in mice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Treatment with opioid agonists disrupts working memory.
“Specifically, treatment with opioid agonists have been reported to interfere with acquisition (Spain and Newsom, 1991;Zhu et al., 2011) and retrieval (Zhu et al., 2011) of spatial memories, and to disrupt working memory (Itoh et al., 1994), avoidance learning (Aguilar et al., 1998;Ukai et al., 1997;Zarrindast and Rezayof, 2004), and spatial recognition memory (Ma et al., 2007).”
From A review of the relation between dissociation, memory, executive functioning and social cognition in military members and civilians with neuropsychiatric conditions (2016) · cites this paper as Itoh et al., 1994
Opioids have been implicated in memory disturbance in the animal literature.
“Opioid receptors are present throughout the cortex and limbic system (Le Merrer et al., 2009) and opioids have been implicated in memory disturbance in the animal literature (Itoh et al., 1994;Ma et al., 2007;Ukai et al., 1997;Zhu et al., 2011).”
From A review of the relation between dissociation, memory, executive functioning and social cognition in military members and civilians with neuropsychiatric conditions (2016) · cites this paper as Itoh et al., 1994
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The pleasures of play: pharmacological insights into social reward mechanisms
Trezza, V., Baarendse, P. J. J., & Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J. (2010) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2010.06.008 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
McKinnon, M. C., Boyd, J. E., Frewen, P. A., Lanius, U. F., Jetly, R., Richardson, J. D., & Lanius, R. A. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.017 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“Opioid receptors are present throughout the cortex and limbic system (Le Merrer et al., 2009) and opioids have been implicated in memory disturbance in the animal literature (Itoh et al., 1994; Ma et al., 2007; Ukai et al., 1997; Zhu et al., 2011).”
V1a receptor knockout mice exhibit impairment of spatial memory in an eight-arm radial maze
Egashira, N., Tanoue, A., Higashihara, F., Mishima, K., Fukue, Y., Takano, Y., Tsujimoto, G., Iwasaki, K., & Fujiwara, M. (2004) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2003.11.050 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Itoh, J., Ukai, M., & Kameyama, T.
- Affiliations
- Meijo University (JP)
- Venue
- The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-21
- ISSN
- 0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2241835364
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Keywords
- dynorphin A(1-13), DAMGO, mu-opioid receptor, kappa opioid receptor, spontaneous alternation, working memory, locomotor activity, beta-funaltrexamine, nor-binaltorphimine, cholinesterase inhibition, opioid antagonists, memory impairment
- MeSH terms
- Analgesics, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Drug Interactions, Dynorphins, Enkephalins, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Mice, Inbred Strains, Peptide Fragments, Physostigmine, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review