Cited by 65Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Dynorphin A-(1-13) potently improves the impairment of spontaneous alternation performance induced by the mu-selective opioid receptor agonist DAMGO in mice

Itoh, J, Ukai, M, Kameyama, T·1994·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

The effects of i.c.v. injection of the mu-selective opioid receptor agonist DAMGO and the effects of its combination with the endogenous kappa-opioid receptor agonist dynorphin A-(1-13) on memory processes were examined in mice, using spontaneous alternation performance associated with working memory in a Y-maze. DAMGO (10 and/or 30 ng) impaired spontaneous alternation performance and increased total arm entries, which are considered to reflect locomotor activity. beta-Funaltrexamine (5 micrograms, i.c.v.), a mu-selective opioid receptor antagonist, almost completely antagonized the impairment of alternation performance induced by DAMGO (10 ng). Physostigmine (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.), a cholinesterase inhibitor, improved the DAMGO (10 ng)-induced impairment of alternation performance. Dynorphin A-(1-13) (1, 3 and 10 micrograms, i.c.v.) alone was without significant effects on alternation performance. On the other hand, dynorphin A-(1-13) (3 and 10 micrograms) significantly improved the impairment of spontaneous alternation performance induced by DAMGO (10 ng). The effects of dynorphin A-(1-13) (3 micrograms) on the DAMGO-induced impairment of spontaneous alternation were almost completely reversed by pretreatment with nor-binaltorphimine (4 micrograms, i.c.v.), a kappa-selective opioid receptor antagonist. The present results demonstrate that DAMGO impairs alternation performance by activating mu-opioid receptors, whereas dynorphin A-(1-13) attenuates the DAMGO-induced impairment of alternation performance through the mediation of kappa-opioid receptors. These findings suggest that mu- and kappa-opioid systems are fully involved in memory function and have opposite effects on spontaneous alternation performance as it is reflected by working memory in mice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(25)38666-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Itoh, J., Ukai, M., & Kameyama, T.
Affiliations
Meijo University (JP)
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-04
Volume
269
Issue
1
Pages
15-21
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2241835364
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
dynorphin A(1-13), DAMGO, mu-opioid receptor, kappa opioid receptor, spontaneous alternation, working memory, locomotor activity, beta-funaltrexamine, nor-binaltorphimine, cholinesterase inhibition, opioid antagonists, memory impairment
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Drug Interactions, Dynorphins, Enkephalins, Male, Memory, Memory Disorders, Mice, Inbred Strains, Peptide Fragments, Physostigmine, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review