Cited by 106Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesRespiratory and Cough-Related Research

Influence of breathing therapy on complaints, anxiety and breathing pattern in patients with hyperventilation syndrome and anxiety disorders

Han, J.N., Stegen, K., De Valck, C., Clément, J., Van de Woestijne, K.P.·1996·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

The effect of breathing therapy was evaluated in patients with hyperventilation syndrome (HVS). The diagnosis of HVS was based on the presence of several suggestive complaints occurring in the context of stress, and reproduced by voluntary hyperventilation. Organic diseases as a cause of the symptoms were excluded. Most of these patients met the criteria for an anxiety disorder. The therapy was conducted in the following sequence: (1) brief, voluntary hyperventilation to reproduce the complaints in daily life: (2) reattribution of the cause of the symptoms to hyperventilation: (3) explaining the rationale of therapy-reduction of hyperventilation by acquiring an abdominal breathing pattern, with slowing down of expiration: and (4) breathing retraining for 2 to 3 months by a physiotherapist. After breathing therapy, the sum scores of the Nijmegen Questionnaire were markedly reduced. Improvements were registered in 10 of the 16 complaints of the questionnaire. The level of anxiety evaluated by means of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) decreased slightly. The breathing pattern was modified significantly after breathing retraining. Mean values of inspiration and expiration time and tidal volume increased, but end-tidal CO2 concentration (FETCO2) was not significantly modified except in the group of younger women (< or = 28 years). A canonical correlation analysis relating the changes of the various complaints to the modifications of breathing variables showed that the impr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00220-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 106

Authors
Han, J. N., Stegen, K., De Valck, C., Clément, J., & Van de Woestijne, K. P.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
481-493
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089339995
Cited by
106
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
Keywords
hyperventilation syndrome, breathing retraining, anxiety disorders, breathing pattern, respiratory rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide, diaphragmatic breathing, physiotherapy, Nijmegen questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, voluntary hyperventilation, tidal volume
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety Disorders, Breathing Exercises, Female, Humans, Hyperventilation, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiratory Function Tests, Sex Factors, Tidal Volume

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review