Are prescribed medications effective in the treatment of insomnia complaints?
Abstract
Although frequently investigated in the general population, the epidemiology of insomnia complaints and their treatment have received little attention in general practice. This study recruited patients > or =15 years of age, consecutively, from 127 general practitioners in France. The physicians collected data from 11,810 of their patients, of whom 55.5% were women. Insomnia complaints were reported by 26.2% (25.4% to 27%) of the sample and use of sleep-promoting medication by 10.1% (9.7% to 10.7%). About 47% of the prescribed drugs used were anxiolytics and 45% hypnotics. Most consumers took sleep-enhancing drugs on a daily and long-term basis and most reported that the medication improved their quality of sleep. However, few distinctions emerged between elderly drug-taking insomniacs and elderly nontreated insomniacs with respect to the various dimensions of sleep. Results underscore the persistent general tendency among French general practitioners to overprescribe anxiolytics for the treatment of insomnia complaints and that they do so on a long-term basis, despite the findings of numerous studies showing that benzodiazepines are ineffective in the treatment of sleep complaints over the long term.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In clinical practice, hypnotic medications are often used over durations of one to twelve months without dosage escalation.
“In clinical practice, hypnotic medications are often used over durations of one to twelve months without dosage escalation, 52-55”
From Clinical Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Insomnia in Adults (2008) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 70
- Authors
- Ohayon, M. M., Caulet, M., Arbus, L., Billard, M., Coquerel, A., Guieu, J.-D., Kullmann, B., Laffont, F., Lemoine, P., Paty, J., Pechadre, J. C., Vecchierini, M.-F., & Vespignani, H.
- Affiliations
- Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel (CA)
- Hôpital Rangueil (FR)
- Hôpital Gui de Chauliac (FR)
- Hôpital Charles-Nicolle (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
- Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
- Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier (FR)
- Hôpital Pellegrin (FR)
- Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard (FR)
- Hôpital Saint-Julien (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Ohayon, Maurice M
- Venue
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-368
- ISSN
- 0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026263413
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
- Keywords
- insomnia, anxiolytics, hypnotics, benzodiazepines, overprescribing, long-term drug use, general practice, elderly patients, sleep quality, primary care prescribing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Family Practice, Female, France, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Population Surveillance, Psychotropic Drugs, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Drug Utilization Review
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review