Cited by 211Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNursing care and researchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Accelerated risk of hypertensive blood pressure recordings among alzheimer caregivers

Shaw, William S., Patterson, Thomas L., Ziegler, Michael G., Dimsdale, Joel E., Semple, Shirley J., Grant, Igor·1999·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the stress of caregiving for the Alzheimer's disease (AD) patient accelerates the likelihood of exceeding hypertensive blood pressure (BP) criteria in periodic longitudinal home assessments. In this cohort study, participants consisted of spousal caregivers of AD patients (n = 144) and demographically equivalent non-caregiving controls (n = 47). Thirty percent of caregivers and 33% of controls were receiving antihypertensive treatment at study entry. Supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) was assessed by semi-automated recordings taken in the home every 6 months for 2 to 6 years. Survival analyses (Cox proportional hazards models) were used to determine whether the hazard for developing hypertension (DBP>140, SBP>90) was greater in caregivers than in controls, and whether increased hazards were related to background characteristics or the extent of caregiving demands. Based on periodic 6-month assessments of BP over 6 years, the hazards of meeting criteria for borderline hypertension were greater for caregivers than for controls (Cox Proportional Hazards, chi2 [1, N = 174] = 4.86, p = 0.03). This difference remained statistically significant (p<0.05) after controlling for age, gender, education, socioeconomic status, body mass index, and use of antihypertensive medications. Increased risk of hypertension was not related to the extent of daily living assistance provided, patient problem behaviors, or caregiver distress. The chronic stress of caring for an AD spouse may have adverse effects on blood pressure; however, the mechanism for this relationship remains unclear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3999(98)00084-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 211

Authors
Shaw, W. S., Patterson, T. L., Ziegler, M. G., Dimsdale, J. E., Semple, S. J., & Grant, I.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Patterson, Thomas L.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-03
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
215-227
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011812873
Cited by
211
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (42840)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, spousal caregivers, caregiver stress, hypertension, blood pressure, borderline hypertension, chronic stress, antihypertensive drugs, caregiver burden, daily living support, caregiver distress, home blood pressure monitoring
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, California, Female, Home Nursing, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Proportional Hazards Models, Caregivers, Spouses, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review