Accelerated risk of hypertensive blood pressure recordings among alzheimer caregivers
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the stress of caregiving for the Alzheimer's disease (AD) patient accelerates the likelihood of exceeding hypertensive blood pressure (BP) criteria in periodic longitudinal home assessments. In this cohort study, participants consisted of spousal caregivers of AD patients (n = 144) and demographically equivalent non-caregiving controls (n = 47). Thirty percent of caregivers and 33% of controls were receiving antihypertensive treatment at study entry. Supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) was assessed by semi-automated recordings taken in the home every 6 months for 2 to 6 years. Survival analyses (Cox proportional hazards models) were used to determine whether the hazard for developing hypertension (DBP>140, SBP>90) was greater in caregivers than in controls, and whether increased hazards were related to background characteristics or the extent of caregiving demands. Based on periodic 6-month assessments of BP over 6 years, the hazards of meeting criteria for borderline hypertension were greater for caregivers than for controls (Cox Proportional Hazards, chi2 [1, N = 174] = 4.86, p = 0.03). This difference remained statistically significant (p<0.05) after controlling for age, gender, education, socioeconomic status, body mass index, and use of antihypertensive medications. Increased risk of hypertension was not related to the extent of daily living assistance provided, patient problem behaviors, or caregiver distress. The chronic stress of caring for an AD spouse may have adverse effects on blood pressure; however, the mechanism for this relationship remains unclear.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compared with noncaregivers, caregivers are at greater risk for developing mild hypertension.
“they are at greater risk for developing mild hypertension (6, 7)”
From Chronic stress and age-related increases in the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6. (2003) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 211
- Authors
- Shaw, W. S., Patterson, T. L., Ziegler, M. G., Dimsdale, J. E., Semple, S. J., & Grant, I.
- Affiliations
- San Diego State University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patterson, Thomas L.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 215-227
- ISSN
- 0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011812873
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (42840)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, spousal caregivers, caregiver stress, hypertension, blood pressure, borderline hypertension, chronic stress, antihypertensive drugs, caregiver burden, daily living support, caregiver distress, home blood pressure monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, California, Female, Home Nursing, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Proportional Hazards Models, Caregivers, Spouses, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review