CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 70Reading and Literacy DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological StudiesEducational Assessment and Improvement

Curriculum-based measurement and literature-based reading: Is curriculum-based measurement meeting the needs of changing reading curricula?

Hintze, John M., Shapiro, Edward S.·1997·Journal of School Psychology
DOI 10.1016/s0022-4405(97)00014-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-4405(97)00014-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 70

Authors
Hintze, J. M., & Shapiro, E. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Lehigh University (US)
Corresponding author
Hintze, John M.
Venue
Journal of School Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-12
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
351-375
ISSN
0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0022-4405(97)00014-9
OpenAlex
W1973863111
Cited by
70
References
38
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
curriculum-based measurement, progress monitoring, oral reading rate, reading instruction, grade level differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review