Cited by 489Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis

Janardhan, Vallabh, Bakshi, Rohit·2002·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Quality of Life (QOL) is impaired in multiple sclerosis (MS) in part due to physical disability. MS-associated fatigue (MSF) and depression (MSD) are common and treatable features of MS, which could also impact on QOL, independent of physical disability. We prospectively studied 60 consecutive patients with MS. QOL was assessed using Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54. Group differences in QOL scores were assessed after adjusting for Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and Hamilton Depression Inventory scores. MS patients were grouped into relapsing-remitting (RR) or secondary-progressive (SP), MSF (FSS> or =5) or MS-nonfatigue (MSNF) (FSS< or =4), and MSD or MS-nondepression (MSND). After accounting for disability and depression, fatigue was associated with impaired QOL with respect to health perception (p=0.03) and limitations due to physical dysfunction (p=0.008). After accounting for disability and fatigue, depression was associated with lower QOL with respect to health perception (p=0.02), sexual dysfunction (p=0.03), health distress (p=0.03), mental health (p=0.006), overall QOL (p=0.006), emotional dysfunction (p=0.04), and limitations due to emotional dysfunction (p=0.03). This study demonstrates that fatigue and depression are independently associated with impaired QOL in MS, after accounting for physical disability, suggesting that their recognition and treatment can potentially improve QOL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-510x(02)00312-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 489

Authors
Janardhan, V., & Bakshi, R.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Kaleida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Bakshi, Rohit
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-12
Volume
205
Issue
1
Pages
51-58
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W24020054
Cited by
489
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1 K23 NS 42379-01, K23NS042379)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, quality of life, fatigue, depression, physical disability, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, sexual dysfunction, emotional dysfunction, MSQOL-54, Fatigue Severity Scale, Expanded Disability Status Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review