Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Quality of Life (QOL) is impaired in multiple sclerosis (MS) in part due to physical disability. MS-associated fatigue (MSF) and depression (MSD) are common and treatable features of MS, which could also impact on QOL, independent of physical disability. We prospectively studied 60 consecutive patients with MS. QOL was assessed using Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (MSQOL)-54. Group differences in QOL scores were assessed after adjusting for Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and Hamilton Depression Inventory scores. MS patients were grouped into relapsing-remitting (RR) or secondary-progressive (SP), MSF (FSS> or =5) or MS-nonfatigue (MSNF) (FSS< or =4), and MSD or MS-nondepression (MSND). After accounting for disability and depression, fatigue was associated with impaired QOL with respect to health perception (p=0.03) and limitations due to physical dysfunction (p=0.008). After accounting for disability and fatigue, depression was associated with lower QOL with respect to health perception (p=0.02), sexual dysfunction (p=0.03), health distress (p=0.03), mental health (p=0.006), overall QOL (p=0.006), emotional dysfunction (p=0.04), and limitations due to emotional dysfunction (p=0.03). This study demonstrates that fatigue and depression are independently associated with impaired QOL in MS, after accounting for physical disability, suggesting that their recognition and treatment can potentially improve QOL.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fatigue and cognitive impairment are the disease-related factors that most reduce quality of life in multiple sclerosis.
“With regard to disease related factors, fatigue and cognitive impairment have been found to be the greatest culprits in reducing QOL in MS.”
From Quality of life and psychological well-being in the early stages of multiple sclerosis (MS): importance of adopting a biopsychosocial model (2018) · cites this paper as [26]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 489
- Authors
- Janardhan, V., & Bakshi, R.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Kaleida Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bakshi, Rohit
- Venue
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 205
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-58
- ISSN
- 0022-510X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W24020054
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1 K23 NS 42379-01, K23NS042379)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, quality of life, fatigue, depression, physical disability, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, sexual dysfunction, emotional dysfunction, MSQOL-54, Fatigue Severity Scale, Expanded Disability Status Scale
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Multivariate Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review