Cited by 2Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

Link of the mechanisms of action of glatiramer acetate to its long-term clinical data.

Moreau, Thibault·2009·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

A consequence of the long-term nature of progression in multiple sclerosis is that treatment needs to be provided over the long term. Gathering evidence for long term clinical efficacy, safety and patient acceptance of immunomodulatory therapies is thus a critically important issue. However, pivotal trials, which generally last no more than two years, cannot address this issue. Glatiramer acetate is the only immunomodulatory treatment for which prospective data is available covering a treatment period of over a decade. In the long-term extension of the pivotal trial of glatiramer acetate, 108 patients have been followed for a mean treatment duration of 10.1 years. At the end of the treatment period, patients were experiencing a relapse only once every five years and 92% remained ambulatory throughout. Similar findings have been made in observational studies in the long-term follow-up of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis treated with glatiramer acetate under a compassionate use programme in France and in a patient registry in Argentina. Such data strongly suggest that a reduced risk of relapse represents a real long-term treatment effect. The cumulative evidence for the long-term clinical efficacy of glatiramer acetate is consistent with its dual mechanism of action, reassures the physician that glatiramer acetate can really help improve patient care over the long term, and may contribute to a more positive view of prognosis for patients with multiple sclerosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-510x(09)70005-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 2

Authors
Moreau, T.
Affiliations
Université de Bourgogne (FR)
Corresponding author
Moreau, Thibault
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
277
Pages
S12-S15
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075466663
Cited by
2
References
19
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
glatiramer acetate, multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, immunomodulatory therapy, long-term clinical efficacy, relapse risk, ambulatory status, long-term follow-up, compassionate use, patient registry, mechanism of action
MeSH terms
Glatiramer Acetate, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Multiple Sclerosis, Peptides, Prognosis, Time, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Risk Reduction Behavior, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review