Link of the mechanisms of action of glatiramer acetate to its long-term clinical data.
Abstract
A consequence of the long-term nature of progression in multiple sclerosis is that treatment needs to be provided over the long term. Gathering evidence for long term clinical efficacy, safety and patient acceptance of immunomodulatory therapies is thus a critically important issue. However, pivotal trials, which generally last no more than two years, cannot address this issue. Glatiramer acetate is the only immunomodulatory treatment for which prospective data is available covering a treatment period of over a decade. In the long-term extension of the pivotal trial of glatiramer acetate, 108 patients have been followed for a mean treatment duration of 10.1 years. At the end of the treatment period, patients were experiencing a relapse only once every five years and 92% remained ambulatory throughout. Similar findings have been made in observational studies in the long-term follow-up of patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis treated with glatiramer acetate under a compassionate use programme in France and in a patient registry in Argentina. Such data strongly suggest that a reduced risk of relapse represents a real long-term treatment effect. The cumulative evidence for the long-term clinical efficacy of glatiramer acetate is consistent with its dual mechanism of action, reassures the physician that glatiramer acetate can really help improve patient care over the long term, and may contribute to a more positive view of prognosis for patients with multiple sclerosis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In multiple sclerosis patients, Copaxone causes a decrease in relapses and lesions.
“Though the exact therapeutic mechanism of Copaxone is not clear [45], in multiple sclerosis patients it causes decrease in relapses and lesions [46].”
From Fabrication Principles and Their Contribution to the Superior In Vivo Therapeutic Efficacy of Nano-Liposomes Remote Loaded with Glucocorticoids (2011) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Moreau, T.
- Affiliations
- Université de Bourgogne (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Moreau, Thibault
- ORCID
- Moreau, Thibault
- Venue
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 277
- Pages
- S12-S15
- ISSN
- 0022-510X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075466663
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Keywords
- glatiramer acetate, multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, immunomodulatory therapy, long-term clinical efficacy, relapse risk, ambulatory status, long-term follow-up, compassionate use, patient registry, mechanism of action
- MeSH terms
- Glatiramer Acetate, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Multiple Sclerosis, Peptides, Prognosis, Time, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Risk Reduction Behavior, Secondary Prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review