Cited by 154Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Traumatic Brain Injury Research

Brain MRI abnormalities exist in a subset of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome

Lange, Gudrun, DeLuca, John, Maldjian, Joseph A, Lee, Huey-Jen, Tiersky, Lana A, Natelson, Benjamin H·1999·Journal of the Neurological Sciences

Abstract

Presence of MRI brain abnormalities in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) was determined and the profile of MRI abnormalities was compared between 39 CFS patients, 18 with (CFS-Psych) and 21 without (CFS-No Psych) a DSM-III-R Axis I psychiatric diagnosis since illness onset, and 19 healthy, sedentary controls (HC). Two neuroradiologists, blind to group membership, separately read the MR films using a detailed protocol for rating and categorizing abnormal signal changes. When findings were incongruent, the two neuroradiologists met to try to reach consensus, otherwise a third neuroradiologist evaluated the MR images and served as a tie-breaker. The CFS-No Psych group showed a significantly larger number of brain abnormalities on T2 weighted images than the CFS-Psych and HC groups. Cerebral changes in the CFS-No Psych group consisted mostly of small, punctate, subcortical white matter hyperintensities, found predominantly in the frontal lobes. No significant difference was found when both CFS groups were combined and compared to the HC group. The use of stratification techniques is an important strategy in understanding the pathophysiology of CFS. This frontal lobe pathology could explain the more severe cognitive impairment previously reported in this subset of CFS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00243-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 154

Authors
Lange, G., DeLuca, J., Maldjian, J. A., Lee, H.-J., Tiersky, L. A., & Natelson, B. H.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Lange, Gudrun
Venue
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-12
Volume
171
Issue
1
Pages
3-7
ISSN
0022-510X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171182758
Cited by
154
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Neurological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01-H52810A)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 32247, U01AI032247)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, brain MRI abnormalities, white matter hyperintensities, frontal lobe, T2-weighted imaging, psychiatric comorbidity, cognitive impairment, pathophysiology, subcortical lesions
MeSH terms
Adult, Atrophy, Mental Disorders, Brain Diseases, Brain Stem, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebral Ventricles, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Myelin Sheath, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review