Stochastic resonance in a single neuron model: Theory and analog simulation
Abstract
Here, we consider a noisy, bistable, single neuron model in the presence of periodic external modulation. The modulation induces a correlated switching between states driven by the noise. The information flow through the system, from the modulation, or signal, to the output switching events, leads to a succession of strong peaks in the power spectrum. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) obtained from this power spectrum is a measure of the information content in the neuron response. With increasing noise intensity, the SNR passes through a maximum: an effect which has been called stochastic resonance, and which was first advanced as a possible explanation of the observed periodicity in the recurrences of the Earth's ice ages. We treat the problem within the framework of a recently developed approximate theory, valid in the limits of weak noise intensity, weak periodic forcing and low forcing frequency, for both additive and multiplicative noise. Moreover, we have constructed an analog simulator of the neuron which demonstrates the stochastic resonance effect, and with which we have measured the SNRs for comparison with the theoretical results. Our model should be of interest in situations where a single inherently noisy neuron is the receptor of a periodic signal, which is itself noisy, either from the network or from an external source.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stochastic resonance can increase the sensitivity of sensory detectors, including neurons, enhancing the detection of weak signals.
“Stochastic resonance can increase the sensitivity of sensory detectors, including neurons, enhancing the detection of weak signals65,66.”
From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [65]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 234
- Authors
- Bulsara, A., Jacobs, E. W., Zhou, T., Moss, F., & Kiss, L.
- Affiliations
- Naval Ocean Systems Center (US)
- University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Theoretical Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1991-10
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 531-555
- ISSN
- 0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066297336
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- stochastic resonance, single neuron model, signal-to-noise ratio, power spectrum, additive noise, multiplicative noise, analog simulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Computer Simulation, Computers, Analog, Mathematics, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Periodicity, Stochastic Processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review