Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neuropsychologic outcome after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in adults

Open access
Reich, David L., Uysal, Suzan, Sliwinski, Martin, Ergin, M.Arisan, Kahn, Ronald A., Konstadt, Steven N., McCullough, Jock, Hibbard, Mary R., Gordon, Wayne A., Griepp, Randall B.·1999·The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric patients undergoing prolonged periods of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest have been found to experience long-term deficits in cognitive function. However, there is limited information of this type in adult patients who are undergoing deep hypothermic circulatory arrest for thoracic aortic repairs. METHODS: One hundred forty-nine patients undergoing elective cardiac or thoracic aortic operations were evaluated preoperatively; 106 patients were evaluated early in the postoperative period (EARLY), and 77 patients were evaluated late in the postoperative period (LATE) with a battery of neuropsychologic tests. Seventy-three patients had routine cardiac operations without deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, and 76 patients with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest were divided into 2 subgroups: those with 1 to 24 minutes of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (n = 36 patients) and those with 25 minutes or more of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (n = 40 patients). The neuropsychologic test battery consisted of 8 tests encompassing 5 domains: attention, processing speed, memory, executive function, and fine motor function. Data were normalized to baseline values, and changes from baseline were analyzed by analysis of covariance, multivariate logistic regression, and survival functions. RESULTS: In all domains, poor performance or inability to be tested EARLY were significant predictors of poor performance LATE (odds ratio, 5.27; P <.01). Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest of 25 minutes or more and advanced age were significant predictors of poor performance LATE for the memory and fine motor domains. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest of 25 minutes or more (odds ratio, 4. 0; P =.02) was a determinant of prolonged hospital stay (>21 days). CONCLUSION: Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest of 25 minutes or more and advanced age were associated with memory and fine motor deficits and with prolonged hospital stay.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70481-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Reich, D. L., Uysal, S., Sliwinski, M., Ergin, M. A., Kahn, R. A., Konstadt, S. N., McCullough, J., Hibbard, M. R., Gordon, W. A., & Griepp, R. B.
Venue
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-01
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
156-163
ISSN
0022-5223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157052004
Cited by
202
References
0
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychologic outcome after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70481-2
The paper
Reich, D. L., Uysal, S., Sliwinski, M., Ergin, M. A., Kahn, R. A., Konstadt, S. N., McCullough, J., Hibbard, M. R., Gordon, W. A., & Griepp, R. B. (1999). Neuropsychologic outcome after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in adults. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70481-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.