Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With Nephrectomy, Interleukin-2 and Cytokine-Primed or CD8(+) Selected Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes from Primary Tumor

Figlin, Robert A., Pierce, William C., Kaboo, Randir, Tso, Cho Lea, Moldawer, Nancy, Gitlitz, Barbara, deKernion, Jean, Belldegrun, Arie·1997·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma is a disease with a mean survival of 6 to 10 months. Interleukin-2 (IL-2), the only approved therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, is associated with a 14% response rate and durable remissions in some patients with high performance status. We performed a series of trials of IL-2 plus tumor infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy and report the clinical results from 62 patients enrolled in these trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had metastatic renal cell carcinoma with the primary tumor in place and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were treated with cytokines before nephrectomy and preparation of cytokine primed tumor infiltrating lymphocytes or CD8(+) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were isolated for infusion into patients. Of 62 patients enrolled 55 were treated with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and IL-2, and were evaluable for toxicity, response and survival. RESULTS: There were no postoperative mortalities. Of the patients 7 (11%) could not undergo systemic therapy. No unexpected IL-2 related toxicities or significant toxicities related to cell infusion were noted. Overall 5 patients (9.1%) achieved a complete response and 14 (25.5%) achieved a partial response. The responses were durable with a median duration of 14 months (range 0.8+ to 64+). The actuarial survival was 65% at 1 year and 43% at 2 years from the time of nephrectomy, with an overall median survival for all patients of 22 months (range 2 to 70+). The median survival for the responding patients has not yet been reached (range 2 to 63+). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that immunotherapy with radical nephrectomy, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and IL-2 provides substantial clinical benefit in the majority of patients. Component cellular therapy with enriched cell fractions allows the administration of a more standardized cell product. The present results with nephrectomy, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and IL-2 are encouraging, and a randomized clinical trial of nephrectomy, CD8(+) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, plus IL-2 versus nephrectomy and IL-2 alone is currently in progress.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64304-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Figlin, R. A., Pierce, W. C., Kaboo, R., Tso, C. L., Moldawer, N., Gitlitz, B., deKernion, J., & Belldegrun, A.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
1997-09
Volume
158
Issue
3
Pages
740-745
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2033316540
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With Nephrectomy, Interleukin-2 and Cytokine-Primed or CD8(+) Selected Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes from Primary Tumor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64304-0
The paper
Figlin, R. A., Pierce, W. C., Kaboo, R., Tso, C. L., Moldawer, N., Gitlitz, B., deKernion, J., & Belldegrun, A. (1997). Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With Nephrectomy, Interleukin-2 and Cytokine-Primed or CD8(+) Selected Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes from Primary Tumor. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64304-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.