The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic 5 Region Prostate Biopsy is Superior to Sextant Method for Diagnosing Carcinoma of the Prostate
Abstract
PURPOSE: The number of patients undergoing prostate biopsy has dramatically increased due to prostate specific antigen screening. The low specificity of this screening tool requires prostate biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer. The sextant biopsy technique has been used widely with success in diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. However, concern has arisen that the original sextant method may not include an adequate sampling of the prostate. For many years we have used a method of prostate biopsy that, in addition to sextant biopsies, takes additional biopsies in a systematic fashion, which we call the 5 region prostate biopsy. We conducted a prospective study to determine if our 5 region prostate biopsy technique significantly increases the chances of finding carcinoma of the prostate compared to the sextant biopsy technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 119 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate. In addition to sextant biopsies, cores were taken from the far lateral and mid regions of the gland. Pathological findings of the additional regions were compared to those of the sextant regions. RESULTS: Of the 48 patients with prostate cancer 17 (35%) had carcinomas only in the additional regions, which would have remained undetected had the sextant biopsy technique been used alone (p < 0.05). Of these additional cancers 83% had Gleason scores of 6 or more. CONCLUSIONS: We introduce the 5 region technique of prostate biopsy as a means of significantly increasing the diagnostic yield of prostate biopsy in finding carcinoma of the prostate. We have found this technique to be safe, efficacious and superior to the sextant method of biopsy in identifying prostate cancer at an early but significant stage. The greatest use of the 5 region biopsy technique is in patients who have prostate specific antigen levels between 4 and 10 ng./ml.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parker, S. L., Tong, T., Bolden, S., & Wingo, P. A. (1996) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.46.1.5 · Cited by 1,759
Random Systematic Versus Directed Ultrasound Guided Transrectal Core Biopsies of the Prostate
Hodge, K. K., McNeal, J. E., Terris, M. K., & Stamey, T. A. (1989) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38664-0 · Cited by 1,571
Catalona, W. J. (1993) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510080052031 · Cited by 998
Stamey, T. A., Freiha, F. S., McNeal, J. E., Redwine, E. A., Whittemore, A. S., & Schmid, H.-P. (1993) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<933::aid-cncr2820711408>3.0.co;2-l · Cited by 799
Long-term Survival Among Men With Conservatively Treated Localized Prostate Cancer
Albertsen, P. C. (1995) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03530080042039 · Cited by 464
Making the most out of six systematic sextant biopsies
Stamey, T. A. (1995) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(95)96168-2 · Cited by 412
Long-term Survival and Mortality in Prostate Cancer Treated with Noncurative Intent
Aus, G., Hugosson, J., & Norlen, L. (1995) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67074-5 · Cited by 191
Cited by
Nam, R. K., Saskin, R., Lee, Y., Liu, Y., Law, C., Klotz, L. H., Loblaw, D. A., Trachtenberg, J., Stanimirovic, A., Simor, A. E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.015 · Cited by 592
Pinto, P. A., Chung, P. H., Rastinehad, A. R., Baccala, A. A., Kruecker, J., Benjamin, C. J., Xu, S., Yan, P., Kadoury, S., Chua, C., et al. (2011) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.05.078 · Cited by 450
Punglia, R. S., D'Amico, A. V., Catalona, W. J., Roehl, K. A., & Kuntz, K. M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021659 · Cited by 326
Deep learning based classification of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound
Wu, K., Chen, X., & Ding, M. (2014) · Optik · doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.01.114 · Cited by 139
Raab, S. S., & Grzybicki, D. M. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20068 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Eskew, L. A., Bare, R. L., & McCullough, D. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 199-203
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2160209118
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 33.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic 5 Region Prostate Biopsy is Superior to Sextant Method for Diagnosing Carcinoma of the Prostate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65322-9
- The paper
- Eskew, L. A., Bare, R. L., & McCullough, D. L. (1997). Systematic 5 Region Prostate Biopsy is Superior to Sextant Method for Diagnosing Carcinoma of the Prostate. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65322-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.