Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Adjuvant Therapy in Superficial Bladder Cancer: Transurethral Resection Only Versus Transurethral Resection Plus Mitomycin C Versus Transurethral Resection Plus Bacillus Calmette-Guerin

Krege, S., Giani, G., Meyer, R., Otto, T., Rubben, H.·1996·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: A randomized multicenter trial was done to compare transurethral resection only to transurethral resection plus adjuvant mitomycin C and bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) instillation for treatment of superficial bladder cancer (stage pTa/1 grades 1 to 3 except primary stage pTa grade 1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in the study were 337 patients with superficial stage pTa/1 grades 1 to 3 bladder cancer except primary stage pTa grade 1 tumors. One group underwent transurethral resection alone. Mitomycin C (20 mg./50 ml. sodium chloride) was given every 2 weeks during year 1 and once a month during year 2. BCG (120 mg/50 ml. sodium chloride was instilled once a week for 6 weeks and once a month for 4 months. RESULTS: At a median followup of 20.2 months, a decrease in recurrence rate was noted for both drug instillations compared to transurethral resection only. The relative risk of recurrence was 0.508 after mitomycin C and 0.618 after BCG instillation compared to transurethral resection alone. There was no significant difference between the mitomycin C and BCG instillations. The progression rate was comparable in all 3 therapy groups, with an estimated common progression rate of 4.22% per year. Side effects occurred most frequently during or after BCG instillation, most often consisting of cystitis. One patient required cystectomy because of ulcerating cystitis and a prostatic abscess subsequent to unsuccessful tuberculostatic therapy. There were no systemic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed a positive effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy on decreasing tumor recurrence rate. No influence was observed concerning progression rate, which was low overall.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65673-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Krege, S., Giani, G., Meyer, R., Otto, T., & Rubben, H.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
1996-09
Volume
156
Issue
3
Pages
962-966
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W1979980489
Cited by
195
References
1
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Adjuvant Therapy in Superficial Bladder Cancer: Transurethral Resection Only Versus Transurethral Resection Plus Mitomycin C Versus Transurethral Resection Plus Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65673-8
The paper
Krege, S., Giani, G., Meyer, R., Otto, T., & Rubben, H. (1996). A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Adjuvant Therapy in Superficial Bladder Cancer: Transurethral Resection Only Versus Transurethral Resection Plus Mitomycin C Versus Transurethral Resection Plus Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65673-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.