Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparison of BTA Stat, Hemoglobin Dipstick, Telomerase and Vysis Urovysion Assays for the Detection of Urothelial Carcinoma in Urine

Open access
HALLING, KEVIN C., KING, WALTER, SOKOLOVA, IRINA A., KARNES, R. JEFFREY, MEYER, REID G., POWELL, ERIC L., SEBO, THOMAS J., CHEVILLE, JOHN C., CLAYTON, AMY C., KRAJNIK, KELLY L., EBERT, THOMAS A., NELSON, ROBERT E., BURKHARDT, HALEH M., RAMAKUMAR, SANJAY, STEWART, CHRISTOPHER S., PANKRATZ, VERNON S., LIEBER, MICHAEL M., BLUTE, MICHAEL L., ZINCKE, HORST, SEELIG, STEVEN A., JENKINS, ROBERT B., O’KANE, DENNIS J.·2002·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determine the sensitivity and specificity of various assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 280 voided urine specimens from 265 patients were obtained immediately before cystoscopy for BTA stat, (Bard Diagnostic, Redmond, Washington) hemoglobin dipstick, (Bayer, Elkhart, Indiana) telomerase and UroVysion (Vysis, a wholly owned subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois) analysis. RESULTS: Of the 265 patients 75 had biopsy proven urothelial carcinoma, and the sensitivity of the assays was determined from these patients. From most sensitive to least sensitive, the overall sensitivity of UroVysion (73 cases), BTA stat (72), hemoglobin dipstick (73) and telomerase (70) was 81%, 78%, 74%, and 46%, respectively. Each of the first 3 tests was statistically significantly more sensitive than the telomerase assay (p <0.05). However, the differences in overall sensitivity of UroVysion, BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick were not statistically significant. The specificity of the tests was calculated for 80 of the 265 patients in this study who had no history of urothelial carcinoma and negative cystoscopy findings despite common urological complaints. From most specific to least specific, the specificity of UroVysion, telomerase, BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick was 96%, 91%, 74% and 51%, respectively. UroVysion and telomerase were statistically significantly (p <0.01) more specific than the BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick assays, and all of the assays were more specific than hemoglobin dipstick testing (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that UroVysion is the most sensitive and specific assay among those tested for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. Telomerase testing had good specificity but poor sensitivity. The BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick tests had good sensitivity but relatively poor specificity. UroVysion is a promising new assay for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine specimens. However, further studies are needed to explore the role of the various assays in the treatment of patients with superficial urothelial carcinoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65072-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
HALLING, K. C., KING, W., SOKOLOVA, I. A., KARNES, R. J., MEYER, R. G., POWELL, E. L., SEBO, T. J., CHEVILLE, J. C., CLAYTON, A. C., KRAJNIK, K. L., EBERT, T. A., NELSON, R. E., BURKHARDT, H. M., RAMAKUMAR, S., STEWART, C. S., PANKRATZ, V. S., LIEBER, M. M., BLUTE, M. L., ZINCKE, H., SEELIG, S. A., JENKINS, R. B., & O’KANE, D. J.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2002-05
Volume
167
Issue
5
Pages
2001-2006
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2127597174
Cited by
188
References
1
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparison of BTA Stat, Hemoglobin Dipstick, Telomerase and Vysis Urovysion Assays for the Detection of Urothelial Carcinoma in Urine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65072-0
The paper
HALLING, K. C., KING, W., SOKOLOVA, I. A., KARNES, R. J., MEYER, R. G., POWELL, E. L., SEBO, T. J., CHEVILLE, J. C., CLAYTON, A. C., KRAJNIK, K. L., EBERT, T. A., NELSON, R. E., BURKHARDT, H. M., RAMAKUMAR, S., STEWART, C. S., PANKRATZ, V. S., LIEBER, M. M., BLUTE, M. L., ZINCKE, H., . . . O’KANE, D. J. (2002). A Comparison of BTA Stat, Hemoglobin Dipstick, Telomerase and Vysis Urovysion Assays for the Detection of Urothelial Carcinoma in Urine. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65072-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.