The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PERCUTANEOUS RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION OF SMALL RENAL TUMORS: INITIAL RESULTS
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Thermal tissue ablation with radio frequency energy is an experimental treatment of renal tumor. We report early results of an ongoing trial of percutaneous radio frequency ablation for small renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with percutaneously accessible renal tumors were evaluated for radio frequency ablation. Tumors were solid on computerized tomography (CT), 3 cm. or less in diameter and enlarging during at least 1 year. Ablation was performed at the Interventional Radiology suite under ultrasound and/or CT guidance. A 50 W., 460 kHz. electrosurgical generator delivered radio frequency energy via a percutaneously placed 15 gauge coaxial probe. At least 2, 10 to 12-minute ablation cycles were applied to each lesion. Patients were observed overnight before discharge from hospital and reevaluated 2 months later. RESULTS: A total of 24 ablations were performed in 21 patients with renal tumor, including solid von Hippel-Lindau clear cell tumor in 19 and hereditary papillary renal cancer 2. Most (22 of 24) procedures were performed with patients under conscious sedation. At 2 months postoperatively mean tumor diameter plus or minus standard deviation decreased from 2.4 +/- 0.4 to 2.0 +/- 0.5 cm. (p = 0.001), and a majority of tumors (19 of 24, 79%) ceased to be enhanced on contrast CT. Mean serum creatinine plus or minus standard deviation was unchanged during this interval (1.0 +/- 0.2 mg./dl.). No major and 4 minor complications were encountered, including 2 episodes each of transient psoas pain and flank skin numbness. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous radio frequency ablation of small renal tumor is well tolerated and minimally invasive. It will remain experimental until procedural and imaging parameters that correlate with tumor destruction are validated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gervais, D. A., McGovern, F. J., Arellano, R. S., McDougal, W. S., & Mueller, P. R. (2005) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.185.1.01850064 · Cited by 587
Srinivasan, R., Iliopoulos, O., Beckermann, K. E., Narayan, V., Maughan, B. L., Oudard, S., Else, T., Maranchie, J. K., Iversen, A. B., Cornell, J., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00099-3 · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- PAVLOVICH, C. P., WALTHER, M. M., CHOYKE, P. L., PAUTLER, S. E., CHANG, R., LINEHAN, W. M., & WOOD, B. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-15
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2163565210
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PERCUTANEOUS RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION OF SMALL RENAL TUMORS: INITIAL RESULTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65371-2
- The paper
- PAVLOVICH, C. P., WALTHER, M. M., CHOYKE, P. L., PAUTLER, S. E., CHANG, R., LINEHAN, W. M., & WOOD, B. J. (2002). PERCUTANEOUS RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION OF SMALL RENAL TUMORS: INITIAL RESULTS. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65371-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.