The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A POSTOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NOMOGRAM FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA
Abstract
PURPOSE: Few published studies have combined prognostic factors to predict the likelihood of recurrence after surgery for renal cell carcinoma. We developed a nomogram for this purpose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we modeled pathological data and disease followup for 601 patients with renal cell carcinoma who were treated with nephrectomy. Predictor variables were patient symptoms, including incidental, local or systemic, histology, including chromophobe, papillary or conventional, tumor size, and pathological stage. Treatment failure was recorded when there was either clinical evidence of disease recurrence or death from disease. Validation was performed with a statistical (bootstrapping) technique. RESULTS: Disease recurrence was noted in 66 of the 601 patients, and those in whom treatment was successful had a median and maximum followup of 40 and 123 months, respectively. The 5-year probability of freedom from failure for the patient cohort was 86% (95% confidence interval 82 to 89). With statistical validation, predictions by the nomogram appeared accurate and discriminating with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, that is a comparison of the predicted probability with the actual outcome of 0.74. CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram has been developed that can be used to predict the 5-year probability of treatment failure among patients with newly diagnosed renal cell carcinoma. The nomogram may be useful for patient counseling, clinical trial design and patient followup planning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Leibovich, B. C., Blute, M. L., Cheville, J. C., Lohse, C. M., Frank, I., Kwon, E. D., Weaver, A. L., Parker, A. S., & Zincke, H. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11234 · Cited by 837
Patard, J.-J., Kim, H. L., Lam, J. S., Dorey, F. J., Pantuck, A. J., Zisman, A., Ficarra, V., Han, K.-R., Cindolo, L., De La Taille, A., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.09.104 · Cited by 423
7-Year Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomy
Lane, B. R., & Gill, I. S. (2010) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.023 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- KATTAN, M. W., REUTER, V., MOTZER, R. J., KATZ, J., & RUSSO, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-67
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2071794510
- Cited by
- 754
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A POSTOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NOMOGRAM FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66077-6
- The paper
- KATTAN, M. W., REUTER, V., MOTZER, R. J., KATZ, J., & RUSSO, P. (2001). A POSTOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NOMOGRAM FOR RENAL CELL CARCINOMA. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66077-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.