Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 434

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CYSTECTOMY FOR BLADDER CANCER: A CONTEMPORARY SERIES

DALBAGNI, GUIDO, GENEGA, ELIZABETH, HASHIBE, MIA, ZHANG, ZUO-FENG, RUSSO, PAUL, HERR, HARRY, REUTER, VICTOR·2001·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate the current TNM staging system, we analyzed our contemporary experience with 300 cystectomies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pathological material and medical records of 300 patients treated with cystectomy were reviewed, and the new TNM classification was adopted. RESULTS: The median followup of patients with no evidence of disease was 65 months, and overall survival rate was 45% with a median survival of 50 months. In a Cox regression analysis only patient age, pT stage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significant factors for survival. The disease specific survival was 67% with a median survival of 94 months. In a multiple proportional hazards analysis only pT stage and previous chemotherapy were significant factors of disease specific survival. A significant difference was seen in the overall and disease specific survival between patients with organ confined and nonorgan confined tumors. We did not observe a difference in the survival rate among patients with pT4a to pT3 tumors. Significant differences were not seen in survival rates between sexes or among patients of different age groups. Transitional cell carcinoma was the predominant histological type, and no significant difference was found in patient outcome among the different histological subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder cancer can be categorized into organ confined and nonorgan confined tumors. This dichotomous grouping is better suited for evaluating adjuvant clinical trials. The pT stage of the bladder and prostate should be prospectively analyzed together to better define the clinical implications of prostatic involvement. In our opinion the histological subtypes do not affect outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66440-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 434

Metadata

Authors
DALBAGNI, G., GENEGA, E., HASHIBE, M., ZHANG, Z.-F., RUSSO, P., HERR, H., & REUTER, V.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2001-04
Volume
165
Issue
4
Pages
1111-1116
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2033511033
Cited by
434
References
1
FWCI
15.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CYSTECTOMY FOR BLADDER CANCER: A CONTEMPORARY SERIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66440-3
The paper
DALBAGNI, G., GENEGA, E., HASHIBE, M., ZHANG, Z.-F., RUSSO, P., HERR, H., & REUTER, V. (2001). CYSTECTOMY FOR BLADDER CANCER: A CONTEMPORARY SERIES. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)66440-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.